Opened 8 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
#27852 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Admin Delete Object Block Page Doesn't Show All Related Objects Blocking Deletion
Reported by: | Kenny Loveall | Owned by: | Hasan Ramezani |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
STR:
- Create three models, two of which reference the third and the references PROTECT on delete, like such:
class ModelA(models.Model): pass class ModelB(models.Model): fk = models.ForeignKey(ModelA, on_delete=models.PROTECT) class ModelC(models.Model): fk = models.ForeignKey(ModelA, on_delete=models.PROTECT)
- Register these models with the admin site
- Create a ModelA, ModelB, & ModelC object. Make ModelB & ModelC reference ModelA, like such:
a = ModelA() b = ModelB(fk=a) c = ModelC(fk=a)
- Go to the admin site and try to delete the ModelA object.
Expected Result: Page listing both b & c as blocking objects
Actual Result: Page listing only b or c, but not both.
After investigation, I've figured out it's because the field.rel.on_delete call in db.models.deletion.py (excerpted below) throws a models.ProtectedError exception and therefore exits the loop early and does not check the rest of the related fields.
def collect(self, objs, source=None, nullable=False, collect_related=True, source_attr=None, reverse_dependency=False): [... omitted for brevity ...] if collect_related: for related in get_candidate_relations_to_delete(model._meta): field = related.field if field.rel.on_delete == DO_NOTHING: continue batches = self.get_del_batches(new_objs, field) for batch in batches: sub_objs = self.related_objects(related, batch) if self.can_fast_delete(sub_objs, from_field=field): self.fast_deletes.append(sub_objs) elif sub_objs: field.rel.on_delete(self, field, sub_objs, self.using) for field in model._meta.virtual_fields: if hasattr(field, 'bulk_related_objects'): # Its something like generic foreign key. sub_objs = field.bulk_related_objects(new_objs, self.using) self.collect(sub_objs, source=model, source_attr=field.rel.related_name, nullable=True)
This was discovered because we're implementing a soft-delete override in the Model layer (so anytime you try to delete things it just sets a timestamp instead of actually removing the data). This became an issue because we take the output of this and filtered it to only objects that we had that were deleted by our standards and found that under certain circumstances we were allowed to delete things when we shouldn't have been. Given this scenario being such an edge case, my hopes for getting this fixed aren't high; although I would argue that it's still a poor user experience for people that aren't trying to do what we're doing where it shows them only *some* of the things blocking the deletion instead of all of them. I'm hoping, however, that hopefully someone can at the very least show us if we can get a list of all the delete-blocking objects from somewhere else?
Given where this is, the bug really seems to be coming from db.models.deletion.Collector so I'm not sure if the component field should be admin or models but I chose admin because that's where it's easily visible (and would impact general Django users).
Attachments (1)
Change History (14)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|---|
Type: | Bug → Cleanup/optimization |
by , 8 years ago
Attachment: | djtest.zip added |
---|
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
I've attached an example project with the data to reproduce the issue. Credentials: admin/Oowae5me
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
Version: | 1.8 → master |
---|
comment:4 by , 8 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:5 by , 8 years ago
Component: | contrib.admin → Database layer (models, ORM) |
---|---|
Has patch: | set |
Added PR
comment:6 by , 7 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
comment:7 by , 5 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
comment:9 by , 5 years ago
Has patch: | unset |
---|
This should be fixed also for restricted related objects.
comment:10 by , 5 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
PR for restricted related objects.
comment:13 by , 5 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
I haven't confirmed the issue or looked into if it's feasible to fix, but if you provide a patch, it seems okay to change.