Opened 11 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#21612 closed Bug (fixed)
queryset update ignores to_field on foreign keys
Reported by: | Owned by: | nobody | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | berndtj@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
When issuing a batch update on a queryset, the to_field of the related model is ignored in some cases. For instance, I am using a uuid field as a foreign key field (to_field). When I try to update the relationship, the pk is used for in the foreign key column (<foreign_model>_id) instead of the uuid. For example given a queryset of BracketVolumeTemplates which have a parent field which refers to a BracketVolume:
# The field definition parent = models.ForeignKey( 'BracketVolume', null=True, blank=True, to_field='uuid', related_name='parent_templates') # We start with a queryset of one which has a BracketVolumeTemplate which refers to a BracketVolume via the parent filed ipdb> queryset [<BracketVolumeTemplate [snapshot based] ID: 10dc67d94f8347d195e25eca6f3c22bb - created by test@brkt.com>] ipdb> queryset[0].parent <BracketVolume [snapshot] Requested State: DELETED ID: 2de07185d9744fdd83b5f683dfe5a2aa - created by test@brkt.com> # The parent_id is correctly set as the UUID ipdb> queryset[0].parent_id u'2de07185d9744fdd83b5f683dfe5a2aa' # We are updating with the kwargs as follows ipdb> kwargs {'parent': <BracketVolume [snapshot] Requested State: AVAILABLE ID: 62b72525425b4252925ba9ce48d42428 - created by test@brkt.com>} ipdb> queryset.update(**kwargs) 1 # Wait, parent_id should be the UUID, but instead the pk is used for the foreign key ipdb> queryset[0].parent_id u'3' # Now the relationship is broken ipdb> queryset[0].parent *** DoesNotExist: BracketVolume matching query does not exist. Lookup parameters were {'uuid__exact': u'3'} # Queryset hides the db_columns, so we can't work around directly ipdb> queryset.update(parent_id='2de07185d9744fdd83b5f683dfe5a2aa') *** FieldDoesNotExist: BracketVolumeTemplate has no field named 'parent_id' # The below workaround does work... ipdb> queryset.update(parent='2de07185d9744fdd83b5f683dfe5a2aa') 1 ipdb> queryset[0].parent <BracketVolume [snapshot] Requested State: DELETED ID: 2de07185d9744fdd83b5f683dfe5a2aa - created by test@brkt.com> ipdb> c
I can work around this by adding the following code in my update code, but it's not ideal:
for key in kwargs: field = queryset.model._meta.get_field(key) if isinstance(field, ForeignKey): model = kwargs[key] if not model: continue rel_att = field.rel.field_name kwargs[key] = getattr(model, rel_att) queryset.update(modified_by=modified_by_id, **kwargs)
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Component: | Uncategorized → Database layer (models, ORM) |
---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
I was gone during the holidays.
I can verify that this behavior exists on the 1.6 branch:
In [23]: b
Out[23]: <BracketUser: new4@berndt.com>
In [25]: BracketGroup.objects.filter(created_by='berndt@…')
Out[25]: [<BracketGroup [made by old] ID: 18b72e3766d947b29f802b637785caf8 - created by berndt@…>, <BracketGroup [default] ID: 96c6018e9ebc4c69a96636bab4ee9aaf - created by berndt@…>]
In [26]: qs = BracketGroup.objects.filter(created_by='berndt@…')
In [27]: qs.update(created_by=b)
IntegrityError Traceback (most recent call last)
/home/vagrant/work/django/<ipython-input-27-1536333ef175> in <module>()
/home/vagrant/work/django/django/db/models/query.pyc in update(self, kwargs)
488 query.add_update_values(kwargs)
489 with transaction.commit_on_success_unless_managed(using=self.db):
--> 490 rows = query.get_compiler(self.db).execute_sql(None)
491 self._result_cache = None
492 return rows
/home/vagrant/work/django/django/db/transaction.pyc in exit(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback)
303 # Commit transaction
304 try:
--> 305 connection.commit()
306 except DatabaseError:
307 connection.rollback()
/home/vagrant/work/django/django/db/backends/init.pyc in commit(self)
166 self.validate_thread_sharing()
167 self.validate_no_atomic_block()
--> 168 self._commit()
169 self.set_clean()
170
/home/vagrant/work/django/django/db/backends/init.pyc in _commit(self)
134 if self.connection is not None:
135 with self.wrap_database_errors:
--> 136 return self.connection.commit()
137
138 def _rollback(self):
/home/vagrant/work/django/django/db/utils.pyc in exit(self, exc_type, exc_value, traceback)
97 if dj_exc_type not in (DataError, IntegrityError):
98 self.wrapper.errors_occurred = True
---> 99 six.reraise(dj_exc_type, dj_exc_value, traceback)
100
101 def call(self, func):
/home/vagrant/work/django/django/db/backends/init.pyc in _commit(self)
134 if self.connection is not None:
135 with self.wrap_database_errors:
--> 136 return self.connection.commit()
137
138 def _rollback(self):
IntegrityError: insert or update on table "nomos_bracketgroup" violates foreign key constraint "created_by_id_refs_username_32f63683ba6621ac"
DETAIL: Key (created_by_id)=(8) is not present in table "nomos_bracketuser".
It's a bit of a different example, but the issue is the same. As you can see, django is trying to update the created_by_id with the PK instead of the to_field which in this case is the username attribute of BracketUser... so it fails.
Testing with master is a bit more work, as things don't appear to just work...
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|---|
Type: | Uncategorized → Bug |
Version: | 1.5 → master |
Hi,
I can reproduce the issue on master as well, using the following models:
class Foo(models.Model): c = models.CharField(max_length=10, unique=True) class Bar(models.Model): foo = models.ForeignKey(Foo, to_field='c')
Using those models, the following test case demonstrates the issue:
def test_issue_21612(self): a = Foo.objects.create(c='a') b = Foo.objects.create(c='b') Bar.objects.create(foo=a) Bar.objects.update(foo=b) bar = Bar.objects.get() self.assertEqual(bar.foo_id, b.c)
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
Verified this still doesn't work. Here is a pull request with test case and possible fix, which seems surprisingly simple:
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I see you've set the version to 1.5. Any chance you can test on 1.6 and/or master? If the bug is still present, a test case for Django's test suite would be helpful.