#31852 closed New feature (needsinfo)
Support async generators in StreamingHttpResponse
Reported by: | Axel Hecht | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | HTTP handling | Version: | 3.1 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Andrew Godwin | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
The DEP for async menytions that async generators should be supported in StreamingHttpResponse.
After some digging, it seems that at least StreamingHttpResponse itself and ASGIHandler.send_response need changes to support that?
Change History (4)
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Resolution: | → needsinfo |
Status: | new → closed |
Type: | Uncategorized → New feature |
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
We definitely should expand to add this, but async generators are quite tough to support across a range of Python versions; they get increasingly better to use every version. I think the best approach here would be an exploratory patch to see what we can get that looks reasonable given Django's current supported Python versions - 3.6 might be a high enough baseline (3.5 is very problematic), but it might be a thing that's easier in a future 3.7+ release.
comment:3 by , 23 months ago
#34300 requested this again, pointing to an implementation at https://pypi.org/project/django-async-stream/.
comment:4 by , 23 months ago
Isn't this supported in 4.2 via (0bd2c0c9015b53c41394a1c0989afbfd94dc2830) #33735?
Yes, this is probably something we should take as a new feature, but it's a little undefined at the moment.
Can I point you to the Forum Async topic: https://forum.djangoproject.com/c/internals/async/8https://forum.djangoproject.com/c/internals/async/8
That's a good place to discuss it, and get fleshed out what would be required.
I'll cc Andrew, as maybe he already has thoughts.