Opened 5 years ago
Last modified 9 months ago
#31317 new Bug
Migration using CreateModel with unique_together followed by AlterUniqueTogether crashes
Reported by: | Adam Johnson | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Migrations | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Ülgen Sarıkavak | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Full project to reproduce: https://github.com/adamchainz/django-unique-together-bug
When squashing migrations I ended up with a migration that added a model with unique_together
, then altered the unique_together later:
migrations.CreateModel( name="Book", fields=[ ( "id", models.AutoField( auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name="ID", ), ), ("title", models.CharField(default="", max_length=100)), ], options={"unique_together": {("title",)},}, ), # ... migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( name="book", unique_together={("title", "author")}, ),
This can crash when using sqlmigrate
or migrate
(see repo) with:
File "/.../django/django/db/backends/base/schema.py", line 380, in alter_unique_together self._delete_composed_index(model, fields, {'unique': True}, self.sql_delete_unique) File "/.../django/django/db/backends/base/schema.py", line 414, in _delete_composed_index ", ".join(columns), ValueError: Found wrong number (0) of constraints for testapp_book(title)
This is because _delete_composed_index
from AlterUniqueTogehter
tries to find the existing constraint name from the database.. But it hasn't been created yet, so it could never be found - its SQL is sitting in deferred_sql
.
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 5 years ago
comment:2 by , 5 years ago
2.2, 3.0, master
It isn't squashed in this case because the unique_together
includes a FK.
# Generated by Django 2.1.15 on 2020-02-28 06:56 from django.db import migrations, models import django.db.models.deletion class Migration(migrations.Migration): replaces = [("testapp", "0001_initial"), ("testapp", "0002_add_author")] initial = True dependencies = [] operations = [ migrations.CreateModel( name="Book", fields=[ ( "id", models.AutoField( auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name="ID", ), ), ("title", models.CharField(default="", max_length=100)), ], options={"unique_together": {("title",)},}, ), migrations.CreateModel( name="Author", fields=[ ( "id", models.AutoField( auto_created=True, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name="ID", ), ), ], ), migrations.AddField( model_name="book", name="author", field=models.ForeignKey( null=True, on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING, to="testapp.Author", ), ), migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( name="book", unique_together={("title", "author")}, ), ]
It's also possible to hand write such a migration.
comment:3 by , 5 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
We'll likely have to use a specialized ddl_statement.Statement
subclass when deferring constraints and indices and have _delete_composed_index
consider them by looping through dereferred_sql
before raising that exception.
That would have the benefit of also avoiding creating constraints meant to be immediately dropped.
comment:4 by , 5 years ago
An alternative would be to translate unique_together = [['a']]
into an extra constraint in constraints
and then it can be treated by migrations as
AddConstraint /
RemoveConstraint` operations. Though that might mean more work.
comment:5 by , 5 years ago
That approach would also not account for constraint name instabilities that shipped over the past years in various Django versions.
comment:7 by , 9 months ago
Cc: | added |
---|
Which version of Django did you use to squash the migrations? A
[CreateModel, AlterUniqueTogether]
sequence should get optimized into[CreateModel]
https://github.com/django/django/blob/e65fea9292ffdeb9bb76062f6cb2a5ff514ae969/django/db/migrations/operations/models.py#L145-L154