Opened 7 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
#28785 closed New feature (wontfix)
Tracking migrations
Reported by: | Ramez Kabbani | Owned by: | Abhinav Yadav |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Migrations | Version: | 1.11 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | yes | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Migrations exist in django in two locations:
- In the codebase under app_name/migrations
- As a db entry in django_migrations
I've come across the following scenario where I expected Django to give an error but it didn't not.
Assume we have 4 migrations for an app, and migration 1 through 3 are applied.
# Content of Postgres DB 32 | app_name | 0001_initial 33 | app_name | 0002_migration2 34 | app_name | 0003_migration3
All migrations except 0001_initial.py were deleted including the folder pycache. We then run makemigrations
# Contents of migration folder after makemigrations was ran. 0001_initial.py 0002_name.py __init__.py __pycache__ # Run makemigrations No Changes Detected # Output of showmigrations app_name [X] 0001_initial [X] 0002_name
Contents of Postgres django_migrations, however, remain unchanged still with an entry for a third migration. I expected an error in one of the following commands but received none: makemigrations, migrate, showmigrations.
Also, migrate --fake app_name 0002_name does not lead to the deletion of 0003_migration3 entry in django_migrations
Change History (10)
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|---|
Type: | Uncategorized → New feature |
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 by , 7 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | set |
A PR adds a check to makemigrations. It still needs some improvement.
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:5 by , 4 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
comment:6 by , 4 years ago
Needs tests: | set |
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | set |
comment:7 by , 3 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:8 by , 3 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:9 by , 2 years ago
#26760 added the --prune
option to migrate
, to clear up stale entries from django_migrations
. Perhaps we no longer need to add a warning now there's this option.
comment:10 by , 2 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Agreed, good spot Adam.
Let's mark as wontfix given the --prune
option, and the difficulty so far in providing an appropriate patch. (If future-someone wants to re-open with a PR for whatever is considered missing then that would be OK.)
Agreed that a warning or system check for this situation would be nice. However, the docs currently suggest a way to turn a squashed migration into a normal migration, and it looks like any database that has had this done will then fail the system check. So, we would need:
SILENCED_SYSTEM_CHECKS
(which would be a bit of a shame)At the least, there might be a good place in the documentation to add a warning that migration files should not be removed.