Opened 8 years ago
Closed 12 months ago
#27813 closed Bug (wontfix)
BinaryField type inconsistent between sqlite3 (bytes) and postgresql (memoryview)
Reported by: | Antonio Terceiro | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | 3.1 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Egor R, Ryan Cheley | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I have an application that has the following model:
class Attachment(models.Model): # ... data = models.BinaryField(default=None)
under sqlite3:
In [1]: Attachment.objects.last().data Out[1]: b'Mon Feb 6 16:53:37 UTC 2017\n'
under postgresql:
In [1]: Attachment.objects.last().data Out[1]: <memory at 0x7f1ae8e93108>
i.e. under sqlite the BinaryField values comes as bytes(), and under postgresql it comes as memoryview()
Change History (12)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
I noticed this because I had a test that checked the value of the data
field after a given operation, and since I was initially developing against sqlite, I compared the value against a bytes()
literal b'...'
. to make the test pass against postgresql as well, I had to cast the value in the database to bytes()
before the comparison.
I would expect to always get the same type, either bytes
or memoryview
. on the other hand, everything else other than that one test just worked. the view that allows for that data to be downloaded worked just fine, because bytes
and memoryview
have a similar enough interface, so maybe this should be just clearly documented.
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
Summary: | BinaryField is inconsistent between sqlite3 and postgresql → BinaryField type inconsistent between sqlite3 (bytes) and postgresql (memoryview) |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
Type: | Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization |
Django's test suite is also casting to bytes for comparison. Accepting for further investigation.
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
The same applies to Oracle backend which also returns bytes. One of the reasons we use Django in current project is that we can run it on Oracle (as needed due to historical reasons) but hopefully convert it to PostgreSQL one day. Subtle differences like this make it more complicated. What is the reason to return different data type from PostgreSQL backend?
comment:6 by , 5 years ago
I am hit by this as well. Returning HttpResponse(mymodel.mybinaryfield)
returns a literal <memory object at 0xdeadbeef>
string instead of the data on Postgres.
comment:7 by , 4 years ago
When using BinaryField as a primary key, it leads to a bug.
For example deleting such a table raises a
TypeError: '<' not supported between instances of 'memoryview' and 'memoryview'
Besides, the resulting type should be consistent, independent on the underlying database.
comment:8 by , 4 years ago
Type: | Cleanup/optimization → Bug |
---|---|
Version: | 1.10 → 3.1 |
comment:9 by , 3 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:10 by , 15 months ago
David Sanders noticed that psycopg>=3.0.17
has started to return bytes
instead of memoryview
so I wonder if we should resolve as ''wont-fix'' here given an available and even preferred solution is available given psycopg2
is on the way out,
comment:11 by , 14 months ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:12 by , 12 months ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
yeah, it makes sense to close this since the fix is actually elsewhere. I'm closing.
I can confirm the difference, however, I can't say if a change should be made. Do you have a suggestion about what to do?