Opened 9 years ago
Last modified 9 months ago
#25887 new Cleanup/optimization
Clarify support for ForeignKey and form fields other than ModelChoiceField
Reported by: | Miriam Gershenson | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Documentation | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | ModelForm, ForeignKey |
Cc: | benjaminjkraft@…, Ülgen Sarıkavak | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
I'm maintaining a project which has a similar situation to #23795: we have an ajax autocomplete form field for ForeignKeys, which in our case inherits from forms.IntegerField
. We also have a custom model field which subclasses ForeignKey in order to override formfield()
and specify our custom form field as the default.
When we updated from Django 1.6 to 1.8, ModelForms for all models using this field started erroring on import because of the limit_choices_to
keyword argument getting inserted by RelatedField.formfield()
, not being handled by our form field (which has no support for limit_choices_to
because we haven't needed it), and eventually being passed to the Field
constructor through some super()
calls.
Here is a simple example of the error:
class CustomForeignKey(models.ForeignKey): def formfield(self, **kwargs): defaults = {'form_class': forms.IntegerField} # or a subclass of forms.IntegerField defaults.update(kwargs) return super(CustomForeignKey, self).formfield(**defaults) class Target(models.Model): pass class NormalFKModel(models.Model): fk = models.ForeignKey(Target) class CustomFKModel(models.Model): fk = CustomForeignKey(Target) # This will work fine until I try to submit the form class NormalFKModelForm(forms.ModelForm): fk = forms.IntegerField() class Meta: model = NormalFKModel fields = '__all__' # This will error on import on all Django versions class CustomFKModelForm(forms.ModelForm): class Meta: model = CustomFKModel fields = '__all__'
A similar error happens even on older Django, or when I add a workaround for limit_choices_to
only; the code I had which worked on 1.6 already included some workarounds for a few other similar issues, which I hadn't been aware of.
The documentation on overriding formfield() doesn't mention this pitfall, and neither does the form field documentation, or any other relevant documentation I could find.
Ideally, both of the ModelForm
examples above would display without erroring, and would work correctly if the forms.IntegerField
is replaced by a subclass which normalizes to model instances rather than integers, especially considering that one of them already meets those conditions. Alternatively, I would also consider this fixed if some documentation were added on special requirements for custom form fields that will be used for ForeignKeys.
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
comment:4 by , 9 years ago
Yes, we have some custom logic in the form field's __init__()
and clean()
as well. In any case, this error happens in almost the same situation as in #23795, but with the addition of a custom model field which exists only to set the custom form field as the default, and if that use case is supported, it makes sense for this one to be as well. The issue with limit_choices_to
was a regression since 1.6, and the documentation currently has no indication that what we're trying to do might not be supported.
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
I haven't fully investigated but I'm not sure Django can do anything about it other than document that your Field
must pop off any unexpected kwargs
. Do you have a proposal?
comment:6 by , 9 years ago
Component: | Forms → Documentation |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
Type: | Bug → Cleanup/optimization |
Accepting as a documentation issue pending further investigation.
comment:7 by , 9 months ago
Cc: | added |
---|
Is there a reason you need a custom form field instead of simply a custom widget?