#22789 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Consider deprecating contrib.webdesign
| Reported by: | Aymeric Augustin | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | contrib.webdesign | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
This app looks like a joke in 2014.
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
|---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
I've never used it myself.
from 2011 mailing list thread:
Carl: +1
Paul M: +0 on webdesign, since it's functionality that's probably in transient use by the more invisible members of our community.
Markus G: I'd miss it even though it's just a tiny piece of code and trivial, it's quite useful when you mock up a site and thus need some text to get a feeling for its layout when there's lots of text involved. I am sure, as you say, there are quite a few people out there who would miss it too.
Gabriel: As for webdesign, why not roll the one piece in it (the marginally-useful lorem tag) into the main library and deprecate the hook in contrib?
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
| Has patch: | set |
|---|
PR to move {% lorem %} to built-in tags and deprecate contrib.webdesign.
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
Such a good idea. I might actually use {% lorem %} now that it's reliably there.
Couldn't agree more, especially since it's trivial to vendor it for whomever needs it.