Opened 19 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
#2151 closed enhancement (duplicate)
Support app renaming in INSTALLED_APPS
Reported by: | Matt McClanahan | Owned by: | anonymous |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | |
Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Design decision needed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Reference thread: http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/7197d27127494ee2/df18ee9b91ba383c
Several implementations were proposed, the one that seems to be most favored is:
INSTALLED_APPS = ( 'foo.bar.baz', ('foo.quux.baz', 'baz2') )
Change History (5)
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Design decision needed |
---|
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
Personally I prefer ('foo.bar.spam.eggs', 'foobar') above the 'foo.bar.spam.eggs as foobar', besides being slower (marginally ofcourse) it just doesn't look as good either.
I admit it's a little more obscure, but with a nice example it should be clear enough for everyone.
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:5 by , 17 years ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Duplicate of #3591. There's a patch there.
Need a decision on which way to go with this.
I agree that it's slightly obscure having
('baz', 'baz2')
(which is the label again?) but also that'baz as baz2'
is a bit "code-in-string"yPersonally I slightly prefer the
'... as ...'
option.