Opened 14 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
#15184 closed Bug (fixed)
Error when subclassing models.ForeignKey field
Reported by: | rupa108 | Owned by: | furious_luke |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | ForeignKey, models, subclassing |
Cc: | furious_luke | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Hello,
subclassing from
djago.db.models.ForeignKey
does not work as documented.
As soon as I do:
__metaclass__ = models.SubfieldBase
accessing a model instance gives the error:
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/roman/devel/kundebunt_new/src/kundebunt/contrib/views.py", line 474, in __call__ call_method_return = call_method(request,obj) File "/home/roman/devel/kundebunt_new/src/kundebunt/contrib/views.py", line 561, in view fields = self._get_record_properties_data(obj) File "/home/roman/devel/kundebunt_new/src/kundebunt/contrib/views.py", line 533, in _get_record_properties_data value = self._get_field_data(record,spalte) File "/home/roman/devel/kundebunt_new/src/kundebunt/contrib/views.py", line 268, in _get_field_data if getattr(record,spalte['name']) == None: File "/home/roman/devel/django-trunk/django/db/models/fields/subclassing.py", line 96, in __get__ return obj.__dict__[self.field.name] KeyError: 'kunde'
Regards
Roman
Attachments (2)
Change History (18)
follow-up: 2 comment:1 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | invalid |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
Hello,
Replying to russellm:
As it says in the docs:
thanks for your reply and sorry if I'm wrong here, however:
I read the docs, and I think I understand them. And I do use SubfieldBase successfully in various places and everything works as expected.
It does not work when subclassing from ForeignKey.
Of course I implement to_python() and occaionally formfield() in my derived classes and also get_prep_lookup(), that's why I need to SubfieldBase ...
But it does not work when subclassing from ForeignKey.
Here is another example:
class FkStandortAX(models.ForeignKey): __metaclass__ = models.SubfieldBase description = "ForeignKey displaying address field prepared for Ajax Autocompletion" def to_python(self,value): standort = dict( name = value.name, strasse = value.adresse and value.adresse.strasse, kfz = value.adresse and value.adresse.land and value.adresse.land.kfz, plz = value.adresse and value.adresse.plz, ort = value.adresse and value.adresse.ort) return u'{name} -- {strasse}, {kfz}{plz} {ort}'.format(**standort)
The column definition in the model:
standort = FkStandortAX(verbose_name=_(u"Standort"),to="popkern.Person", db_column='standort')
When using it:
In [1]: from kundebunt.housing import models In [2]: r=models.RZ.objects.all()[3] In [3]: r._meta.fields Out[3]: [<django.db.models.fields.AutoField object at 0x1434410>, <django.db.models.fields.DateTimeField object at 0x1434250>, <django.db.models.fields.CharField object at 0x1434290>, <kundebunt.contrib.models.fields.FkStandortAX object at 0x1434310>] In [4]: [f.name for f in r._meta.fields] Out[4]: ['id', 'timestamp', 'name', 'standort'] In [5]: r.standort --------------------------------------------------------------------------- KeyError Traceback (most recent call last) /home/roman/devel/kundebunt_new/src/kundebunt/<ipython console> in <module>() /home/roman/devel/django-trunk/django/db/models/fields/subclassing.pyc in __get__(self, obj, type) 94 if obj is None: 95 raise AttributeError('Can only be accessed via an instance.') ---> 96 return obj.__dict__[self.field.name] 97 98 def __set__(self, obj, value): KeyError: 'standort'
Accessing r.standort should not raise an error here. It's there in the field list but it's not accessible. How is the value that to_python returns supposed to be accessed if not like this?
Regards
Roman
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
Ok - I'm going to mark this accepted -- line 96 of subclassing.py looks like it should be field.attname, not field.name. There may be other problems involved with subclassing ForeignKey that follow on from that fix; that will require some additional investigation.
However, I would make two comments:
- When reporting a bug, you need to give us *all* the information you have, not just the bits you want to give us. Nowhere in your mailing list posts or in this ticket did you mention that you were using to_python. That's a pretty important detail for anybody that wants to reproduce the problem. Remember, if we can't reproduce your problem, the problem effectively doesn't exist.
- The reason you've found this bug is that you are almost certainly Doing It Wrong (tm). Your model layer shouldn't care whether it's being used for AJAX or not. A foreign key is a pointer to another model. The "value" for that model is something that uniquely references another object. A primary key value (or, by proxy, a Django object that encapsulates that primary key value) is the most sensible representation of that value. The need to be "AJAXified" is a display level concern. AJAX rendering considerations should be in your forms/templating layer, not your data model.
comment:4 by , 14 years ago
Thank's for taking the time to investigate this and sorry for confusing things. You're right, I certainly got mixed up and the things I'm trying to do should be done differently. Nevertheless I'm glad that you consider to make changes here.
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
Severity: | → Normal |
---|---|
Type: | → Bug |
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | reopened → new |
by , 14 years ago
Attachment: | foreignkey_subclass_patch.diff added |
---|
Patch to correct a bug in subclass ForeignKeyField.
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
The issue appeared to be that SubfieldBase's descriptor was stomping on ForeignKey's. I've added a check for an existing value under the same name in SubfieldBases's descriptor; this way if the field name is missing from a model's __dict__
attribute we can hand off responsibility to the previously existing descriptor.
A new unit test has been added to check for this problem.
comment:8 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | fixed |
---|---|
Status: | closed → reopened |
The ticket will be closed as fixed the day that a patch actually gets *checked in* to Django.
comment:12 by , 12 years ago
Status: | reopened → new |
---|
comment:13 by , 11 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
Patch needs to be updated to apply cleanly.
by , 10 years ago
Attachment: | foreignkey_subclass_patch.20141018.diff added |
---|
An updated version of the previous patch. This one works cleanly with the current master branch.
comment:14 by , 10 years ago
SubfieldBase
has been deprecated in Django 1.8. Can the issue be reproduced without it? If so, please update the patch, thanks. If not, we should close this ticket.
comment:16 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
@furious-luke, we'll close the ticket as fixed then.
As it says in the docs:
"
If you're handling custom Python types, such as our Hand class, we need to make sure that when Django initializes an instance of our model and assigns a database value to our custom field attribute, we convert that value into the appropriate Python object. The details of how this happens internally are a little complex, but the code you need to write in your Field class is simple: make sure your field subclass uses a special metaclass:
"
That is, you only use SubfieldBase if your Field type will be handling custom Python types -- such as the Hand object in the custom fields example. If you're just looking to add behavior to an existing Django field type, you don't have to use the metaclass.