Opened 14 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#14485 closed New feature (wontfix)
New Site.root field
Reported by: | George Sakkis | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.sites | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | g.szczepanczyk@… | Triage Stage: | Someday/Maybe |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I'd like to propose a new 'root' field for django.contrib.sites.models.Site, useful for sites that are deployed under a subdirectory, e.g. "http://example.com/mysite/"; Site.root here would be "mysite". The obvious use case is for exposing full urls instead of absolute paths that Django produces and consumes internally, but it may have other usages.
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 14 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Design decision needed |
---|
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Component: | Contrib apps → contrib.sites |
---|
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
Severity: | → Normal |
---|---|
Type: | → New feature |
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
Easy pickings: | unset |
---|---|
milestone: | 1.3 |
Triage Stage: | Design decision needed → Someday/Maybe |
UI/UX: | unset |
Not a bad idea, but we'd have to wait until some method in core for updating before adding a field to a core model (for a relatively edge use case) is acceptable.
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
Summary: | New Site.root field [feature request] → New Site.root field |
---|
comment:7 by , 12 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:8 by , 9 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I think it would be a better use of time to try moving the Site
model to a setting as discussed on the mailing list.
Adding this will break old apps on upgrade, so it's not a trivial addition.