Opened 15 years ago
Closed 14 years ago
#13753 closed (fixed)
Generic views don't redirect to an URL name, like django.shortcuts.redirect does
Reported by: | Owned by: | nobody | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Generic views | Version: | 1.2 |
Severity: | Keywords: | redirect DRY | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I just noticed that the post_save_redirect
parameter of generic views (update_object
, and friend) doesn't have the same abilities as django.shortcuts.redirect
(in fact, it reinvents the wheel).
When an URL name is passed, it will not do a lookup, but redirect to that given name.
The following does not work as expected:
def edit(request, item_id): return update_object(request, object_id=item_id, model=Context post_save_redirect='myapp-context-index')
It needs a manual resolve call:
from django.core import urlresolvers def edit(request, item_id): return update_object(request, object_id=item_id, model=Context post_save_redirect=urlresolves.reverse('myapp-context-index')) # manual resolving
Unlike the django.shortcuts.redirect
function, which does allow the URL name to be used:
return redirect("myapp-context-index")
In other words, could the generic view use django.shortcuts.redirect
internally too?
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Function-based generic views were deprecated by the introduction of class-based views in [14254]. Class-based views should solve this problem.
A reasonable suggestion; however, it may be better to integrate this into the #6735 rewrite of generic views, rather than work on a patch against the current generics.