#13674 closed (fixed)
Javascript for adding inline fields doesn't update "for" attribute in label
Reported by: | Jonas von Poser | Owned by: | Tay Ray Chuan |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.admin | Version: | 1.2 |
Severity: | Keywords: | admin | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I do some checking for required fields using Javascript in the admin. Doing that, I noticed that adding inline fields doesn't update the "for" attribute for the new <label> fields. If the field is called "image", the newly added field label looks like this:
<label class="required" for="id_images-__prefix__-image">Image:</label>
This is the patch that solved it for me:
diff --git a/django/contrib/admin/media/js/inlines.js b/django/contrib/admin/media/js/inlines.js index cf79023..90b50b5 100644 --- a/django/contrib/admin/media/js/inlines.js +++ b/django/contrib/admin/media/js/inlines.js @@ -75,6 +75,14 @@ }).each(function() { var el = $(this); el.attr("name", el.attr("name").replace(/__prefix__/g, nextIndex)); + }) + .end() + .filter(function() { + var el = $(this); + return el.attr("for") && el.attr("for").search(/__prefix__/) >= 0; + }).each(function() { + var el = $(this); + el.attr("for", el.attr("for").replace(/__prefix__/g, nextIndex)); }); if (row.is("tr")) { // If the forms are laid out in table rows, insert
Attachments (2)
Change History (13)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Component: | Uncategorized → django.contrib.admin |
---|---|
milestone: | → 1.3 |
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:2 by , 14 years ago
by , 14 years ago
Attachment: | 0001-fix-updating-of-the-for-attribute-in-new-admin-inlin.patch added |
---|
comment:3 by , 14 years ago
Attached a patch for both the full and minified JS files.
Note that apart from changing the regex to search for __prefix___
instead of a number (\d+
), the capturing parentheses ()
has also been removed, since we don't need the matched result.
comment:4 by , 14 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
#15106 was a duplicate and contained a pattch similar to the fix suggested by the OP of this ticket.
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
The patch applies and fixes this bug. See also #14303 for a related (but different) bug.
comment:7 by , 14 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin → Accepted |
Patch applies and fixes the bug, but introduces a different bug -newly created inlines don't validate.
To reproduce:
- Use a parent model with a TabularInline child, with extra=3
- apply patch 0001
- Add a new parent object
- Add 1 extra inline row
- Populate all 4 inline objects (the 3 default provided, plus the 1 added inline).
- Try to save the object
The object will fail validation, and lose the data for the fourth inline. If you re-enter and save, the data is saved successfully.
comment:8 by , 14 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
Thanks for spotting this issue, Russ - and sorry for having missed it. I've attached a patch which should fix the root problem. Taking the liberty to RFC again so it gets on your radar for the 1.3 home stretch.
by , 14 years ago
Attachment: | 13674_inlines_label_ids.diff added |
---|
Replying to Jonas:
You should be modifying
updateElementIndex()
instead - it will be much cleaner.