#7478 closed (fixed)
Paginator could detect if the object_list is a QuerySet or a list
Reported by: | Owned by: | nobody | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Keywords: | paginator | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
If the Paginator is accidentally used to count a large QuerySet (instead of a QuerySetPaginator), the generated SQL request could be inefficient (all content will be retrieved just to make len on it). Why don't we automatically detect if object_list has a count attribute? The paginator API will be simpler and it will be more difficult to introduce performance issues.
def _get_count(self): if self._count is None: if hasattr(self.object_list, 'count'): self._count = self.object_list.count() else: self._count = len(self.object_list) return self._count count = property(_get_count)
And by the way the Paginator is far way to simple for my needs so I have sub class it. But I can't derivate from both QuerySetPaginator and Paginator. It's antoher reason why I think it's not a good idea to have 2 classes.
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 16 years ago
Component: | Uncategorized → Core framework |
---|---|
Keywords: | paginator added |
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
comment:4 by , 16 years ago
if isinstance(self.object_list, QuerySet): self._count = self.object_list.count()
comment:5 by , 16 years ago
I am using this one and it works nicely:
def _get_count(self): if self._count is None: if isinstance(self.object_list, QuerySet): self._count = self.object_list.count() else: self._count = len(self.object_list) return self._count count = property(_get_count)
comment:7 by , 16 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Woops count is not the good attribute to test because lists also have it. "all" seems a safe choice to me.