Opened 17 years ago

Closed 12 years ago

Last modified 12 years ago

#6648 closed Cleanup/optimization (worksforme)

random seed identical among preforked FastCGI instances

Reported by: nezroy@… Owned by: nobody
Component: Core (Other) Version: dev
Severity: Normal Keywords: random seed fastcgi fcgi prefork
Cc: flori@…, mmitar@… Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: yes Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

While writing a basic captcha module, I was encountering a lot of duplicate strings of "random" text that I could not explain. Then I remembered seeing this comment on a separate session issue: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/1180#comment:20

Based on that info, I setup some extra logging, and it did appear that each of my FastCGI threads were producing identical random values. I was specifically using a call like this: random.choice('ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ'). It's possible other random methods are not affected, I was only interested in that one. It seems the random seed is set prior to the fork, and each forked process thereafter produces identical random output as a result.

In my setup, I run manage.py with method=prefork, runfcgi, and a static number of processes. This is on an Ubuntu Gutsy AMD 64-bit (on Xen) with Python 2.5.1. I'm currently running against SVN Django, revision 7049.

My workaround was to add a middleware class with an init function that sets the random seed. This gets called at "startup" in each of the new FCGI processes, giving them unique random output. Obviously not ideal, but it gets the job done in my case.

import logging, logging.config
import os, random, time

class ReseedRandom(object):
  def __init__(self):
    logging.debug("setting new random seed for this process")
    random.seed("%d%s" % (os.getpid(), time.ctime()))

It would be much cleaner if the manage.py FCGI launcher could seed its random number generator AFTER the fork occurs, rather than before (or not at all, as the case may be).

Attachments (2)

6648_fix_random_number_generator_fcgi_fork.diff (785 bytes ) - added by peritus <peritus@…> 16 years ago.
Resets the random number generator's seed for each fcgi-child
6648_fix_random_number_generator_fcgi_fork-2.diff (712 bytes ) - added by Mitar 13 years ago.
For Django 1.3+

Download all attachments as: .zip

Change History (16)

comment:1 by Simon Greenhill, 16 years ago

Triage Stage: UnreviewedDesign decision needed

by peritus <peritus@…>, 16 years ago

Resets the random number generator's seed for each fcgi-child

comment:2 by peritus <peritus@…>, 16 years ago

Has patch: set
Triage Stage: Design decision neededUnreviewed

I can reproduce this - my users could :(

Given the following view and lighty+fastcgi+prefork:

def do_random(request):
    return HttpResponse(random.sample('ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ', 5))

Produces in subsequent requests:

XDQIU AJMNL JIQXN XDQIU IROXL AJMNL YAPJL CUYOK ODKLA JIQXN WACZR IROXL CYUJE SNQLX YAPJL CUYOK UMOWL ODKLA PIXQG WACZR CYUJE

which is *NOT* random.

Applying the patch, the same view produces

QBLDN THPXF VSJQB RIPTF EZQRL OSNZY HQSOB VJSED HQBTO UTOJI VSTFY NHPBY QMITZ WJGZB QVDRN QCIOT GWYVQ RGZHE TXHKI

which seems fairly random.

comment:3 by anonymous, 16 years ago

Cc: flosch@… added

comment:4 by anonymous, 16 years ago

Cc: flori@… added; flosch@… removed

comment:5 by peritus <peritus@…>, 16 years ago

Component: UncategorizedCore framework

Reported this upstream:

http://trac.saddi.com/flup/ticket/35

I think, django should to add the workaround though.

comment:6 by peritus <peritus@…>, 16 years ago

This has been fixed in flup >= 1.0.2 (to be released):

http://trac.saddi.com/flup/changeset/137726cdcd67

comment:7 by anonymous, 16 years ago

Triage Stage: UnreviewedAccepted

comment:8 by buffi, 16 years ago

The current patch is broken.
ctime() will only produce different output each second (an example output is 'Mon Apr 27 14:18:38 2009'), so the same process will get the same random seed if two requests are handed to it during the same second.

It would be better to use something like random.seed("%d%f" % (getpid(), time())) , but I'm unsure if this is the correct way to fix this issue, so I won't submit a patch.

comment:9 by anonymous, 15 years ago

Actually by using '%d%f' % (getpid(), time()) you're usually decreasing the randomness of the generator since if you don't pass anything then os.urandom() will be used on most supporting operating systems (windows and linux for example), which is more random than hash() which will be used in the case of passing a string to seed().

comment:10 by Julien Phalip, 14 years ago

Type: Cleanup/optimization

comment:11 by patchhammer, 14 years ago

Easy pickings: unset
Patch needs improvement: set
Severity: Normal

6648_fix_random_number_generator_fcgi_fork.diff fails to apply cleanly on to trunk

by Mitar, 13 years ago

For Django 1.3+

comment:12 by Mitar, 13 years ago

Cc: mmitar@… added
Patch needs improvement: unset
UI/UX: unset

I have attached a new patch version. It simply calls random.seed() as this itself tries to initialize from os.urandom if available or current time.

I came upon this problem with current Django version and python-flup package from Debian (1.0.2).

comment:13 by Łukasz Rekucki, 12 years ago

Resolution: worksforme
Status: newclosed

nginx + flup from pypi (both 1.0.2 and 1.0.3.dev-20110405) seem to work for me.

comment:14 by Mitar, 12 years ago

Have you tried preforking?

Could there be a test case made which would somehow test this?

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top