#4092 closed (fixed)
django/contrib/localflavor/usa/forms.py USStateSelect missing blank options
Reported by: | Owned by: | rokclimb15 | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.localflavor | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Keywords: | ||
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
This field needs to have the default starting option of ('', '----------')
so people don't accidentally forget to change it and have a bunch of submissions for Alabama.
I can submit a patch for this later on if needed
Chad Simmons
Attachments (4)
Change History (26)
comment:1 by , 18 years ago
comment:2 by , 18 years ago
Component: | Uncategorized → django.contrib.localflavor |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:3 by , 17 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
(Fixed description formatting)
I'm not really sure what to do about this. The blank entry (if we include it), should be inserted by the widget, since it's not part of the data. And possibly only inserted if no choice is selected. We should also do the same thing for every other localflavor widget; nothing special about the US version here.
Patches welcome, certainly. Something to look at might make it easier to decide.
comment:4 by , 17 years ago
I was looking at this and there are 20 Select widgets which would need to be changed.
It feels like there should be a new base widget which deals with the empty choice (The same way there is for the ModelChoiceField.
I could just be over thinking things and making them more complex than necessary.
from itertools import chain class NullSelect(Select): def __init__(self, attrs=None, choices=(), empty_label=u"---------"): empty_choice = ((u'', empty_label),) super(NullSelect, self).__init__(attrs, chain(empty_choice, choices))
With this addition, the newforms.models.ModelChoiceField would no longer need the empty_label,
and would use the newforms.widgets.NullSelect widget instead.
comment:6 by , 17 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:7 by , 17 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
Didn't notice that it was claimed. Sorry. Is there going to be a new base widget?
comment:8 by , 17 years ago
I am making two different patches. One w/o the new base, and one with a new base, updated docs, and a regression test.
by , 17 years ago
Attachment: | 4092_6194_simple.diff added |
---|
Simple patch which does not include a new base widget, but adds an empty_label to each localflavor Select widget
comment:9 by , 17 years ago
NOTE: holding off on setting the 'has_patch' flag until I get the second extended patch done, then will open up the discussion to the developer list.
by , 17 years ago
Attachment: | 4092_6248_nullselect.diff added |
---|
New NullSelect widget which is used as the base for all the localflavor select widgets, and replaces the ModelField default widget,.
comment:10 by , 17 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
The nullselect patch includes documentation and regression tests.
It is as up to date as I can make it.
The older simple patch is now out of data and does not include required test fixes.
I can easily make a new simple patch if the NullSelect widget is rejected.
comment:11 by , 17 years ago
This looks pretty good. I'm not 100% happy with the name "NullSelect", but I'm not sure if there's a better color for that particular bikeshed.
Oh, and this needs a test for NullSelect itself (there are tests for subclasses, but no the widget itself).
by , 17 years ago
Attachment: | 4093_6352_nullselect.diff added |
---|
Updated patch with better NullSelect implementation which accepts empty_label on render method, and has full tests
comment:12 by , 17 years ago
I really don't care for NullSelect either. I thought of other names (EmptySelect, BlankSelect, etc) but NullSelect fit the meme of NullBooleanSelect and others.
I also considered adding the empty_label to the !Select widget it's self, but there is no good way of doing this
without breaking most implementations out there. The nice part about NullSelect is that it does not change any existing behavior.
One option would be to add it to !Select, defaulting to None, and providing a EMPTY_LABEL global for people to use
(so that u'--------' is defined somewhere). This would be a rather verbose way of doing it though.
comment:13 by , 17 years ago
Without this patch I can't make an optional address in my model using USStateField. This should be committed soon.
Hmm, why is this still marked as new? It's been assigned and has a patch. Wierd.
comment:14 by , 17 years ago
Tim Saylor: if you want to help advance the ticket, feel free to fix the problems that were mentioned above. Complaining adds no value.
comment:15 by , 17 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|
comment:16 by , 17 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
---|
comment:17 by , 17 years ago
What complaints? The only things complained about recently were the name NullSelect, and Jacob said he can't think of anything better, and a lack of tests for the base NullSelect class, which dougn appears to have fixed. I'd be glad to help, but I don't know what's needed.
comment:18 by , 16 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | set |
Since this hasn't been touched in 11 months, I'm assuming that the original assignee isn't interested in completing this ticket anymore. For now, I will assign it to myself to test and polish up this patch to be compatible with the current trunk. If dougn would like to continue working on this, feel free to reassign it to him.
by , 16 years ago
Attachment: | 4092_9912_nullselect.diff added |
---|
Updated patch to make it compatible with r9912. Remove modifications to forms.models
comment:19 by , 16 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Patch needs improvement: | unset |
I have updated dougn's patch so it is now compatible with r9912. I removed modifications to forms.models since I don't think we want all model generated choicefields to have this type of widget. Eliminating the empty label option produced failures in the forms test cases. If someone wants to use this widget with their ModelChoiceField, they can override the widget for the ChoiceField in kwargs.
comment:20 by , 16 years ago
What further needs to be done on this issue in order to get this patch accepted into SVN?
#10969 is also an alternate solution to dealing with this issue.
comment:21 by , 15 years ago
Has patch: | unset |
---|---|
Resolution: | → fixed |
Status: | new → closed |
Summary: | django/contrib/localflavor/usa/forms.py USStateSelect missing blank options → Ticket closed. This issue has been taken care of in #10969. |
comment:22 by , 15 years ago
Summary: | Ticket closed. This issue has been taken care of in #10969. → django/contrib/localflavor/usa/forms.py USStateSelect missing blank options |
---|
Reverting the summary. This issue was fixed as a part of #10969.
.... it stripped off the blank value ticktick