Opened 3 months ago

Last modified 2 months ago

#35667 assigned Cleanup/optimization

Switch usage to skip_file_prefixes instead of stacklevel when it makes sense

Reported by: Simon Charette Owned by: Jae Hyuck Sa
Component: Utilities Version: dev
Severity: Normal Keywords: deprecation stacklevel
Cc: Adam Johnson Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: yes Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

In most of our usages of warnings.warn (and almost every usage that relates to deprecation warnings) we want them to be associated to the first out-of-as that's the most likely location that can be adjusted to avoid the warning.

In order to achieve this goal we've historically attempted to pass a fixed stacklevel to warnings.warn which can sometimes be tricky and error prone depending on how nested and convoluted the user or third-party app offending call site might be. In other cases we've opted not to provide a stacklevel at all as determining the offending call site under all circumstances is impossible.

Well it appears that this is a problem that Python 3.12 allows frameworks to address in a better way with the introduction of warnings.warn(skip_file_prefixes: tuple[str] | None). This new feature would allow us to ensure that the proper offending call site is referenced when emitting from a deeply nested call site where stacklevel is inappropriate.

Since this is a Python 3.12+ feature I'd suggest we introduce a get_non_django_stacklevel() -> int (better name welcome) function that could be used to pass to warnings.warn(stacklevel) until we drop support for Python 3.11.

Change History (6)

comment:1 by Simon Charette, 3 months ago

Summary: Switch warnings.warn usage to skip_file_prefixes instead of stacklevelSwitch usage to skip_file_prefixes instead of stacklevel when it makes sense

comment:2 by Natalia Bidart, 3 months ago

Keywords: deprecation stacklevel added
Triage Stage: UnreviewedAccepted
Version: 5.1dev

Hello Simon, as always thank you for your detailed and thorough report.

I agree with your proposal, I think this would help reducing the mistakes and overall improve the contributing experience. I'm setting this version to dev since this new feature should target 5.2 at this point.

comment:3 by Mohammad Salehi, 3 months ago

Hello, If you agree, I would like to review this issue and start working on it ?
Thank you.

comment:4 by Simon Charette, 3 months ago

I think we might want to wait for the patch for #35666 to land before committing efforts here Mohammad.

comment:5 by Jae Hyuck Sa , 2 months ago

Owner: set to Jae Hyuck Sa
Status: newassigned

comment:6 by Jae Hyuck Sa , 2 months ago

Has patch: set
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top