Opened 7 months ago
Closed 7 months ago
#35416 closed Bug (duplicate)
Removing a primary_key field causes a migration crash
Reported by: | Sarah Boyce | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Migrations | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
[I am using SQLite]
Create a model with a primary_key field and makemigrations and migrate
from django.db import models class MySimpleModel(models.Model): some_pk = models.IntegerField(primary_key=True)
Then remove the field and makemigrations
class MySimpleModel(models.Model): pass
This prompts you to supply a default because
It is impossible to add a non-nullable field 'id' to mysimplemodel without specifying a default.
If you supply a default, you get a migration like this:
from django.db import migrations, models class Migration(migrations.Migration): dependencies = [ ('app3', '0001_initial'), ] operations = [ migrations.RemoveField( model_name='mysimplemodel', name='some_pk', ), migrations.AddField( model_name='mysimplemodel', name='id', field=models.BigAutoField(auto_created=True, default=1, primary_key=True, serialize=False, verbose_name='ID'), preserve_default=False, ), ]
This crashes when you migrate with:
django.db.utils.OperationalError: near ")": syntax error
But if you remove the provided default from the migration and switch the order so that the field is added before the previous primary_key field is removed, the migration can be applied.
This is very similar to #22997 and certainly related (they didn't remove the field but instead altered the field to no longer be a primary_key in that ticket).
I am not sure whether to class this as a duplicate and require a fix as part of #22997 - happy to hear opinions here.
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 7 months ago
Type: | Uncategorized → Bug |
---|
comment:2 by , 7 months ago
comment:3 by , 7 months ago
Resolution: | → duplicate |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Thank you for verifying - duplicate of #22997.
I would qualify this as a duplicate of #22997 as changing a model from
to
Is exactly removing an explicit primary key.
The ticket also describes the questioner asking about providing a default value.
I think that your first instinct was right, this is the same issue which is not specific to Postgres.