Opened 3 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
#32910 closed Bug (fixed)
Different plural forms for some languages.
Reported by: | Martin Svoboda | Owned by: | Mariusz Felisiak |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Internationalization | Version: | 2.2 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Claude Paroz | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
#30439 has cause translations with different plural forms definitions are loaded in a separated catalogue.
Contrib apps Sites, Redirects and Sessions have different plural form definitions than other Slovak (SK) translations.
Change History (14)
comment:1 by , 3 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Summary: | Contrib apps: Different plural forms for Slovak → Contrib apps: Different plural forms for Slovak (SK) |
comment:2 by , 3 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|---|
Type: | Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization |
comment:3 by , 3 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:5 by , 3 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|---|
Version: | 3.2 → 2.2 |
I think we should update plural forms for all languages and backport this changes.
comment:6 by , 3 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
Summary: | Contrib apps: Different plural forms for Slovak (SK) → Different plural forms for some languages. |
There are more affected languages I will fetch translations from Transifex and prepare PR.
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 3 years ago
I don't think the backports are needed, isn't this only an optimization?
comment:9 by , 3 years ago
Replying to Claude Paroz:
I don't think the backports are needed, isn't this only an optimization?
I assumed that e3e48b00127c09eafe6439d980a82fc5c591b673 broke the previous behavior for users using multiple contrib apps, but I'm not an expert in this area.
comment:10 by , 3 years ago
Claude, if you think that backport is not necessary, I'd be more than happy to merge this to the main
branch only.
comment:11 by , 3 years ago
Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin → Accepted |
---|
follow-up: 13 comment:12 by , 3 years ago
As I see it, the PR is improving things in that only one catalog is created for each language. But even in the current situation, I don't really see a bug (or the PR should demonstrate it with a regression test). See also that most or all affected catalogs don't contain any plural strings.
comment:13 by , 3 years ago
Replying to Claude Paroz:
As I see it, the PR is improving things in that only one catalog is created for each language. But even in the current situation, I don't really see a bug (or the PR should demonstrate it with a regression test). See also that most or all affected catalogs don't contain any plural strings.
Thanks for the clarification. I updated PR.
We backported #30439. We need to decide whether that's required here too (or if it's just a cleanup)