Opened 4 years ago
Last modified 8 months ago
#32674 new New feature
DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD changes should be detected for PKs of auto-created intermediate M2M models.
Reported by: | Cristiano Coelho | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Migrations | Version: | 4.0 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD AutoField BigAutoField ManyToManyField |
Cc: | ccoelho@…, Tom Forbes, Simon Charette, Andrew Godwin, Shai Berger, Markus Holtermann, אורי, Ülgen Sarıkavak | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Django 3.2 introduced DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD = 'django.db.models.AutoField'
. However, if we set it to BigAutoField, I would expect that the intermediary table created for ManyToMany relationships also honor this value.
Right now, we end up with tables that have FKs as bigint, but their own PK as integer. This may not be a direct bug, but will cause issues for sure.
Ideally, ManyToManyField should have an easy way to configure its PK without having to implement the through
model.
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 4 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Component: | Uncategorized → Migrations |
Easy pickings: | unset |
Severity: | Normal → Release blocker |
Summary: | DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD should also be used for ManyToMany table primary keys → DEFAULT_AUTO_FIELD changes should be detected for PKs of auto-created intermediate M2M models. |
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
Type: | Uncategorized → Bug |
comment:2 by , 4 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Severity: | Release blocker → Normal |
Type: | Bug → New feature |
Version: | 3.2 → 4.0 |
I tried, I really really tried, but after few days of using different approaches I need to conclude that this is massive, extremely complicate, and maybe even unfeasible. As far as I'm aware we've never took into account changes in auto-created many-to-many tables except for those directly related with a definition of ManyToManyFields
. A project state used by migrations autodetector doesn't include auto-created model, so the only fix that I can imagine would require including through_pk_type
in the ManyToManyField.deconstruct()
but it's also tricky and error-prone.
We're going to document this caveat and treat this ticket as a new feature.
comment:3 by , 4 years ago
comment:4 by , 4 years ago
Can we at least provide more detailed migration steps? Right now, the only alternative is to go table by table and do the migration more or less manually. This is very time consuming for large projects.
comment:7 by , 4 years ago
A project state used by migrations autodetector doesn't include auto-created model, so the only fix that I can imagine would require including through_pk_type in the ManyToManyField.deconstruct() but it's also tricky and error-prone.
That seems like the only solution to me as well.
Having a through_pk: Field(primary_key=True)
option instead of through_pk_type
seems more flexible though as it would allow easier customization e.g. though_pk=UUIDField(default=uuid.uuid4, primary_key=True)
. I guess it could also serve as a way to define a composite primary key on the from_field
and to_field
if we ever manage to add support for that e.g. through_pk=CompositePrimaryKey('author', 'book')
.
comment:8 by , 3 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:9 by , 8 months ago
Cc: | added |
---|
Thanks for this report. I agree we should detect this change for PKs of auto-created intermediate models.