Document that urlpatterns can be a sequence object.
Why urlpatterns has to be a *Python list*? Doesn't all sequences (an object that implements collections.abc.Sequence interface) counts for that. IMO this description should change at url dispatching page. As a real example i'm using collections.UserList based pattern manager for it (can be found in here)
Change History
(8)
Description: |
modified (diff)
|
Easy pickings: |
set
|
Summary: |
Why urlpatterns has to be a *Python list*? → Document that urlpatterns can be an iterable object.
|
Triage Stage: |
Unreviewed → Accepted
|
Type: |
Bug → Cleanup/optimization
|
Version: |
2.2 → master
|
Owner: |
changed from nobody to Jonatas CD
|
Status: |
new → assigned
|
Summary: |
Document that urlpatterns can be an iterable object. → Document that urlpatterns can be a sequence object.
|
Resolution: |
→ fixed
|
Status: |
assigned → closed
|
Agreed, we can clarify this in syntax-of-the-urlpatterns-variable, e.g. "... should be an iterable (e.g. a list or tuple) of ..."