Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#29897 closed Bug (fixed)
Initial migration fails when referencing a custom user model from a sequence of at least two concrete ancestor models
Reported by: | Steven Ganz | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Migrations | Version: | 2.1 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | "custom user model" "abstract model" "foreign key" |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
The following model fails on initial migration.
from django.db import models from django.contrib.auth.models import (AbstractBaseUser) class A(models.Model): createdByUser = models.ForeignKey('User', related_name='creations+', verbose_name='creatorUser', blank=True, null=True, editable=False, on_delete=models.PROTECT) class B(A): pass class User(AbstractBaseUser, B): email = models.EmailField('email address', max_length=256, unique=True, db_index=True) USERNAME_FIELD = 'email' @property def username(self): return self.email
settings.py contains:
AUTH_USER_MODEL = 'core.User'
Output of running the migrations:
Applying core.0001_initial...Traceback (most recent call last): File "./manage.py", line 13, in <module> execute_from_command_line(sys.argv) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 364, in execute_from_command_line utility.execute() File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 356, in execute self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 283, in run_from_argv self.execute(*args, **cmd_options) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 330, in execute output = self.handle(*args, **options) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/core/management/commands/migrate.py", line 204, in handle fake_initial=fake_initial, File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/migrations/executor.py", line 115, in migrate state = self._migrate_all_forwards(state, plan, full_plan, fake=fake, fake_initial=fake_initial) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/migrations/executor.py", line 145, in _migrate_all_forwards state = self.apply_migration(state, migration, fake=fake, fake_initial=fake_initial) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/migrations/executor.py", line 244, in apply_migration state = migration.apply(state, schema_editor) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/migrations/migration.py", line 129, in apply operation.database_forwards(self.app_label, schema_editor, old_state, project_state) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/migrations/operations/fields.py", line 88, in database_forwards field, File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/base/schema.py", line 431, in add_field definition, params = self.column_sql(model, field, include_default=True) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/base/schema.py", line 160, in column_sql db_params = field.db_parameters(connection=self.connection) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 994, in db_parameters return {"type": self.db_type(connection), "check": self.db_check(connection)} File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 991, in db_type return self.target_field.rel_db_type(connection=connection) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 909, in target_field return self.foreign_related_fields[0] File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 653, in foreign_related_fields return tuple(rhs_field for lhs_field, rhs_field in self.related_fields if rhs_field) File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 640, in related_fields self._related_fields = self.resolve_related_fields() File ".../lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/fields/related.py", line 625, in resolve_related_fields raise ValueError('Related model %r cannot be resolved' % self.remote_field.model) ValueError: Related model 'core.User' cannot be resolved
Notably, this works fine with any of the following modifications:
- model B is removed, closing the chain
- createdByUser is moved to B or removed altogether
- either A or B is made abstract
- the referenced model is not the custom user model
This is not just a matter of preference for concrete classes, as only a concrete class can be referenced through a foreign key.
Change History (8)
comment:1 by , 6 years ago
comment:2 by , 6 years ago
Severity: | Release blocker → Normal |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
From my local testing this has been broken since at least Django 1.11 but the makemigrations
's behavior changed in the current master as the optimizer got more aggressive and assumes operation to be appropriately ordered which is not the case here.
Migrations generated on Django 1.11, 2.0, and 2.1
Migrations for 'core': core/migrations/0001_initial.py - Create model A - Create model B - Add field createdByUser to a - Create model User
Migration generated on the current master
Migrations for 'core': core/migrations/0001_initial.py - Create model A - Create model B - Create model User
An interesting thing here is that everything works fine on the current master if AUTH_USER_MODEL
is not set to core.User
. Given the optimizer is completely swappable model agnostic the issue most probably lies in the auto-detector swappable model dependency resolution.
To make it clear the expected operation's order here is the same as if the model wasn't swappable
Migrations for 'core': core/migrations/0001_initial.py - Create model A - Create model B - Create model User - Add field createdByUser to a
Downgrading to non-release blocker as this is not a regression and can be easily worked around by either generating the migration without AUTH_USER_MODEL
pointed at core.User
(and then adjusting it) or by manually altering the migration to move the AddField(ForeignKey(User))
operation after the CreateModel(User)
one.
comment:3 by , 6 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
I accidentally reset your changes to several fields -- please check that I've restored them appropriately.
This was for an initial migration. Like you, I reproduced it on 1.11 & 2.1.
Your first work-around didn't work for me (perhaps because my actual models are much more complex), but the second (temporarily updating the custom user model) does. Thanks, and let me know if you need any more information.
comment:4 by , 6 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
comment:5 by , 6 years ago
Steven, could you confirm https://github.com/django/django/pull/10577 fixes your issue.
comment:6 by , 6 years ago
Yes, that at least gets the migrations to run. Thanks for the quick turn-around!
Hello there,
Did you reproduce against Django 2.1?
Could you provide the content of your initial migration as well?