Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
#28924 closed Bug (invalid)
path function in Django 2.0 does not seem to work with django-rest-framework's format_suffix_patterns function
| Reported by: | Aakash Jha | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Core (URLs) | Version: | 2.0 |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | path |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
The newly introduced path() function in django.urls does not work with format_suffix_patterns() function of rest_framework.urlpatterns.
As mentioned in http://www.django-rest-framework.org/tutorial/2-requests-and-responses/ , in order to receive a response from the api server in the desired format, a .json or .api might be appended with the url. This does not seem to work when the urlpattern[] has its urls mentioned in the new path() function.
When I switched back to using url() in urlpatterns[], the issue was resolved.
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 7 years ago
| Summary: | path function in Django 2.0 does not seem to work with django-rest-framework's format_suffix_patterns function that is used to refer to a specific response format → path function in Django 2.0 does not seem to work with django-rest-framework's format_suffix_patterns function |
|---|
comment:2 by , 7 years ago
| Resolution: | → invalid |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
Given no reason was provided about what Django's
pathis doing wrong I believe this something that should be fixed on the DRF side.Please re-open if you can provide more details about what Django is doing wrong as simply reporting that a third party feature is not working as documented when used with a newly introduced Django feature strongly indicates that the third party, DRF in this case, simply didn't add proper support for
pathyet.