#27509 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
Installing Geospatial libraries documentation: `gdal-bin` contradicting recommendation.
| Reported by: | Luke Murphy | Owned by: | Luke Murphy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Documentation | Version: | 1.10 |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | geospatial, geodjango |
| Cc: | Claude Paroz | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | yes | UI/UX: | no |
Description
In the first section, it reads:
On Debian/Ubuntu, you are advised to install ...
$ sudo apt-get install binutils libproj-dev gdal-bin
Optional packages to consider:
...
gdal-bin: for GDAL command line programs like ogr2ogr
...
gdal-bin is advised and optional? Should it be remove from the Optional packages to consider section?
I'd submit a patch if this is a mix up, otherwise, feel free to close.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 8 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|---|
| Easy pickings: | unset |
| Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
comment:2 by , 8 years ago
Technically speaking, only the libgdal* library is required. Unfortunately, the exact package name changes in almost all distro versions (libgdal1-1.7.0, libgdal1h, libgdal1i, libgdal20…). We might simply remove the gdal-bin recommendation in the optional list.
comment:3 by , 8 years ago
| Easy pickings: | set |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from to |
| Status: | new → assigned |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
The text was introduced in 3084b1cfd6110e2ef57f1a67f8b7dbda309e2e13, though the contraction preceded that commit. What do you suggest, Claude?