#26051 closed Cleanup/optimization (wontfix)
Rename ATOMIC_REQUESTS to ATOMIC_VIEWS
| Reported by: | Sven R. Kunze | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | HTTP handling | Version: | dev |
| Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | tzanke@… | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Internal discussion within our company revealed that the common misunderstanding results from a slightly wrong name of the config parameter: ATOMIC_REQUESTS
We found that ATOMIC_VIEWS would be better.
Also related: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/26043
Change History (3)
comment:1 by , 9 years ago
comment:2 by , 9 years ago
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Agreed that if the new middleware proposal works out, that'll be better in the long run. Here's the draft pull request.
comment:3 by , 9 years ago
| Cc: | added |
|---|
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
That makes sense. However I'm not convinced the slight improvement in naming correctness is worth the backwards incompatibility.
There's a proposal for a new middleware schema floating around. Perhaps it will allow implementating a safe
TransactionMiddlewareagain. I'd rather wait for this to happen.I'm leaving the ticket open to get other opinions.