Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
#24167 closed New feature (wontfix)
Backend-agnostic template internationalization
Reported by: | Aymeric Augustin | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Internationalization | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | multiple-template-engines |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Someday/Maybe | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Change History (7)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Owner: | removed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → new |
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Someday/Maybe |
For the record, I didn't use that approach, I recommended using Babel instead. [Edit: this sentence used Jinja2 instead of Babel by mistake]
It's increasingly unclear to me that this is a problem that needs solving.
I'll leave the ticket open because 1.8 has been released only recently.
However I don't plan to work on it and I won't be surprised if it ends up as wontfix.
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Aymeric: I think you meant to say "I recommended using Babel instead"? Or else I'm misunderstanding something.
I think that "just use Babel instead" is a fine option, and there's not much value in having makemessages
wrap Babel.
(In the long run, I wonder if we could deprecate makemessages
and just recommend https://pypi.python.org/pypi/django-babel instead).
comment:6 by , 10 years ago
I wonder how many people using Jinja2 with Django use Babel? The django-jinja library, at least, takes the approach of overriding the makemessages command instead.
Personally, I've found Babel much less constrained than makemessages when the translation workflow requires anything custom, e.g. multiple domain files, files that shouldn't automatically remove obsolete strings, combining po files from multiple apps from a single repository into one, only extracting pot files, etc. These are situational, but with Babel there's minimal retooling necessary if you want to do it. The same can't be said for makemessages.
comment:7 by , 9 years ago
Resolution: | → wontfix |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
I haven't heard anyone requesting this since Django 1.8 was released. I assume everyone is happily using Babel.
I'm going to close this as wontfix because there doesn't appear to be a need for this feature. If you think there is, please bring it up on the DevelopersMailingList.
Since this ticket describes a new feature and wasn't implemented before 1.8 alpha, it will make it into 1.9 at best. I will use the approach described in #23299 in 1.8 because it's less invasive.