Opened 11 years ago

Closed 11 years ago

#21053 closed Uncategorized (worksforme)

Missing related fields

Reported by: joshua.fialkoff@… Owned by: grue
Component: Database layer (models, ORM) Version: 1.5
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Triage Stage: Unreviewed
Has patch: no Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

I have an application with these 4 models (amongst others):

Code highlighting: 

class Note(CaseModel):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
    notes = models.TextField(blank=True)

    @property
    def shortened_notes(self):
        if len(self.notes) > 100:
            return self.notes[:100] + '...'
        return self.notes


class Document(CaseModel):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
    upc = models.CharField(max_length=100, verbose_name="UPC")
    file = models.FileField(upload_to="prvate/documents/")
    notes = models.TextField(blank=True)

    @property
    def shortened_notes(self):
        if len(self.notes) > 100:
            return self.notes[:100] + '...'
        return self.notes

class NoteAttachTo(AttachTo):
    class Meta:
        verbose_name = 'Attach To'
        verbose_name_plural = 'Attach to'
        unique_together = ('note', 'attach_to_type', 'attach_to_id')

    note = models.ForeignKey(Note)


class DocumentAttachTo(AttachTo):
    class Meta:
        verbose_name = 'Attach To'
        verbose_name_plural = 'Attach to'
        unique_together = ('document', 'attach_to_type', 'attach_to_id')

    document = models.ForeignKey(Document)

AttachTo and CaseModel are abstract base models with fields that are common to their subclasses. Note that Note and Document are essentially copies of each other. However, while Note has the related field noteattachto, Document does not have documentattachto:

Code highlighting: 

In [1]: from cases.models import Note, Document                      

In [2]: Note._meta.get_all_field_names()
Out[2]: ['case', u'id', 'name', 'noteattachto', 'notes']

In [3]: Document._meta.get_all_field_names()
Out[3]: ['case', 'file', u'id', 'name', 'notes', 'upc']

I tried to debug this a bit and added a print statement in db/models/options.py - _fill_related_objects_cache:

Code highlighting: 

      #### Starting on line 438 of db/models/options.py
      # Collect also objects which are in relation to some proxy child/parent of self.
      proxy_cache = cache.copy()
      for klass in get_models(include_auto_created=True, only_installed=False):
          print(self.db_table + ': ' + klass.__name__)
          if not klass._meta.swapped:
              for f in klass._meta.local_fields:
                  ...

The relevant output is below. Note that, when the model cache is being built for Document, neither DocumentAttachTo or NoteAttachTo are available. Those models do, however, become available immediately after "Validating models..." is printed to the screen. At this point, I'm not really sure what's going on.

django_content_type: ContentType
django_content_type: Permission
django_content_type: Group_permissions
django_content_type: Group
django_content_type: User_groups
django_content_type: User_user_permissions
django_content_type: User
django_content_type: Site
django_content_type: Case
django_content_type: Debtor
django_content_type: Claim_debtors
django_content_type: Claim
django_content_type: Note
django_content_type: Document
django_content_type: PartyRole
django_content_type: Party
django_content_type: Contact
django_content_type: CourtProceeding
django_content_type: Session
django_content_type: LogEntry
django_content_type: MigrationHistory
cases_claim: ContentType
cases_claim: Permission
cases_claim: Group_permissions
cases_claim: Group
cases_claim: User_groups
cases_claim: User_user_permissions
cases_claim: User
cases_claim: Site
cases_claim: Case
cases_claim: Debtor
cases_claim: Claim_debtors
cases_claim: Claim
cases_claim: Note
cases_claim: Document
cases_claim: PartyRole
cases_claim: Party
cases_claim: Contact
cases_claim: CourtProceeding
cases_claim: Session
cases_claim: LogEntry
cases_claim: MigrationHistory
cases_document: ContentType
cases_document: Permission
cases_document: Group_permissions
cases_document: Group
cases_document: User_groups
cases_document: User_user_permissions
cases_document: User
cases_document: Site
cases_document: Case
cases_document: Debtor
cases_document: Claim_debtors
cases_document: Claim
cases_document: Note
cases_document: Document
cases_document: PartyRole
cases_document: Party
cases_document: Contact
cases_document: CourtProceeding
cases_document: Session
cases_document: LogEntry
cases_document: MigrationHistory
Validating models...

auth_permission: ContentType
auth_permission: Permission
auth_permission: Group_permissions
auth_permission: Group
auth_permission: User_groups
auth_permission: User_user_permissions
auth_permission: User
auth_permission: Site
auth_permission: Case
auth_permission: Debtor
auth_permission: Claim_debtors
auth_permission: Claim
auth_permission: Note
auth_permission: Document
auth_permission: PartyRole
auth_permission: Party
auth_permission: Contact
auth_permission: CourtProceeding
auth_permission: NoteAttachTo
auth_permission: DocumentAttachTo
auth_permission: Session
auth_permission: LogEntry
auth_permission: MigrationHistory
cases_note: ContentType
cases_note: Permission
cases_note: Group_permissions
cases_note: Group
cases_note: User_groups
cases_note: User_user_permissions
cases_note: User
cases_note: Site
cases_note: Case
cases_note: Debtor
cases_note: Claim_debtors
cases_note: Claim
cases_note: Note
cases_note: Document
cases_note: PartyRole
cases_note: Party
cases_note: Contact
cases_note: CourtProceeding
cases_note: NoteAttachTo
cases_note: DocumentAttachTo
cases_note: Session
cases_note: LogEntry
cases_note: MigrationHistory

Change History (2)

comment:1 by grue, 11 years ago

Owner: changed from nobody to grue
Status: new → assigned

comment:2 by grue, 11 years ago

Resolution: → worksforme
Status: assigned → closed

I've been unable to replicate this. Could you provide any additional information or test cases that would allow me to reproduce this bug?

models.py:

from django.db import models


class CaseModel(models.Model):
    case = models.CharField(max_length=100)

    class Meta:
        abstract = True


class Note(CaseModel):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
    notes = models.TextField(blank=True)

    @property
    def shortened_notes(self):
        if len(self.notes) > 100:
            return self.notes[:100] + '...'
        return self.notes


class Document(CaseModel):
    name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
    upc = models.CharField(max_length=100, verbose_name="UPC")
    file = models.FileField(upload_to="prvate/documents/")
    notes = models.TextField(blank=True)

    @property
    def shortened_notes(self):
        if len(self.notes) > 100:
            return self.notes[:100] + '...'
        return self.notes


class AttachTo(models.Model):
    class Meta:
        abstract = True


class NoteAttachTo(AttachTo):
    class Meta:
        verbose_name = 'Attach To'
        verbose_name_plural = 'Attach to'
        unique_together = ('note', 'attach_to_type', 'attach_to_id')

    note = models.ForeignKey(Note)


class DocumentAttachTo(AttachTo):
    class Meta:
        verbose_name = 'Attach To'
        verbose_name_plural = 'Attach to'
        unique_together = ('document', 'attach_to_type', 'attach_to_id')

    document = models.ForeignKey(Document)

console output:

In [1]: from cases.models import Note, Document

In [2]: Note._meta.get_all_field_names()
Out[2]: ['case', u'id', 'name', 'noteattachto', 'notes']

In [3]: Document._meta.get_all_field_names()
Out[3]: ['case', 'documentattachto', 'file', u'id', 'name', 'notes', 'upc']

python version: Python 2.7.3

pip freeze:

Django==1.5.2
argparse==1.2.1
ipython==1.0.0
wsgiref==0.1.2
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top