Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
#19246 closed Cleanup/optimization (fixed)
SECURE_PROXY_SSL_HEADER Example in Documentation Should Use X-Forwarded-Proto Instead of X-Forwarded-Protocol
Reported by: | Owned by: | nobody | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Documentation | Version: | 1.4 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | yes | UI/UX: | no |
Description
While setting up a reverse proxy scenario with nginx and AWS I noticed the documentation uses an example (while technically correct) is somewhat off-kilter from emerging de-facto standards for the header in question.
For example - the Elastic Load Balancer uses:
There is also a wikipedia article mentioning the same thing (albeit not the bible):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_header_fields
I would like to see the documentation perhaps reflect the state of things most common in the working world if possible.
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 12 years ago
Easy pickings: | set |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
Type: | Uncategorized → Cleanup/optimization |
comment:2 by , 12 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Fixed in 2cc1884383a0b5371854be6806851521b623f45b