#13008 closed Bug (fixed)
@never_cache decorator should add 'no-cache' & 'no-store'
Reported by: | harm | Owned by: | Markus Bertheau |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Cache system) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Oliver Beattie, net147 | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
I noticed that the never_cache django/views/decorators/cache.py
does not add all the proper http headers to prevent that a page is cached.
It just adds a max-age=0. This does _not_ prevent browsers to actually cache that page.
For example when hitting back, firefox will happily show such a page if the connection to the server disappeared.
proposal, let never_cache() act as advertised: never cache. Let it add 'no-cache, must-revalidate' to the http response.
something like:
--- virtualenv/src/django/django/utils/cache.py 2010-03-02 15:11:54.000000000 +0100 +++ /tmp/cache.py 2010-03-02 15:11:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -104,6 +104,8 @@ cache_timeout = settings.CACHE_MIDDLEWARE_SECONDS if cache_timeout < 0: cache_timeout = 0 # Can't have max-age negative + patch_cache_control(response, no_cache=True) + patch_cache_control(response, must_revalidate=True) if not response.has_header('ETag'): response['ETag'] = '"%s"' % md5_constructor(response.content).hexdigest() if not response.has_header('Last-Modified'):
Attachments (1)
Change History (25)
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
Needs tests: | set |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
follow-up: 3 comment:2 by , 15 years ago
comment:3 by , 15 years ago
Replying to lukeplant:
Personally, I really hate it when I press the back button and the browser tells me I can't view that page any longer.
Me too. But I don't see that behavior (from Firefox 3.5.7 or 3.6, or Chrome 4.0) if I run with the proposed change. In fact I don't even see either of those browsers re-requesting the page on using the back and forward buttons if I run with the proposed change, so I'm not entirely sure the proposed change accomplishes what it was intended to.
I do see IE8 re-request the page with the proposed change. However, for the others I have to also add: patch_cache_control(response, no_store=True)
, before they will start re-fetching the page when accessed via the back/forward buttons. But when they refetch, they all do it automatically and not with any error message about not being able to access the page anymore (unless I stop the server and then I get the standard can't establish connection message).
comment:4 by , 15 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:5 by , 14 years ago
Severity: | → Normal |
---|---|
Type: | → Bug |
@kmtracey - I just realised, we don't see those annoying pages about not being able to view the page because they happen when the page has been set to never cache/store AND was the result of a POST. Since we always re-direct after a POST in Django admin, we don't see those pages, and the web browser is happy to silently re-request the page, since the pages in history are always the result of GET requests. Well done us!
comment:6 by , 14 years ago
Besides the no_cache and must_revalidate this also needs no_store. (For Firefox)
+ patch_cache_control(response, no_store=True)
comment:9 by , 12 years ago
Shouldn't this also set the Pragma: no-cache
header? (See http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.9)
comment:10 by , 12 years ago
I think it should not be needed. Pragma: no-cache
is intended for http requests, not http responses. (See http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.9)
comment:11 by , 12 years ago
More explicitly, http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html#sec14.32 says:
Note: because the meaning of "Pragma: no-cache as a response
header field is not actually specified, it does not provide a
reliable replacement for "Cache-Control: no-cache" in a response
I can't see must-revalidate
being necessary, either. But maybe I'm overlooking something.
by , 12 years ago
Attachment: | 13008.diff added |
---|
comment:12 by , 12 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|
comment:13 by , 12 years ago
confirmed, must-revalidate
is not necessary.
tested adding cache control headers with
@cache_control(max_age=0, no_cache=True, no_store=True)
on FF 19.0 + FF 19.02 + chrome 25 (on mac)
A 'back' button in the browser, does NOT reload a view.
So I think your patch 13008.diff is correct.
comment:14 by , 12 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
comment:15 by , 11 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|---|
Status: | new → assigned |
Summary: | @never_cache decorator should add 'no-cache' & 'must-revalidate' → @never_cache decorator should add 'no-cache' & 'no-store' |
comment:16 by , 11 years ago
Where should I write a test? Should it be in cache/tests.py
? The function add_never_cache_headers
is never tested in thetests/
directory.
comment:17 by , 10 years ago
This issue is related to https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/23755 (patch_cache_control should special case "no-cache")
comment:18 by , 10 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
PR with test in https://github.com/django/django/pull/4565
comment:19 by , 10 years ago
Needs tests: | unset |
---|---|
Version: | 1.2-beta → master |
comment:20 by , 10 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
The patch looks rather good. Tim, a last review?
Personally, I really hate it when I press the back button and the browser tells me I can't view that page any longer. Adding this behaviour to all the admin pages could be a pain in the neck, especially in the common work flow of "list of objects -> click one to edit/view -> go back to the list because you don't need to change it". Oon the other hand I am probably a 'power user' who knows when I am likely to be dealing with old data, and I can always use new tabs. But I do think we should think about the usability impact on the admin, which has 'never_cache' applied everywhere.