Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
#12463 closed (wontfix)
user_passes_test should transfer view_func parameters to test_func
| Reported by: | Alexandre Garnier | Owned by: | nobody |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | Uncategorized | Version: | 1.1 |
| Severity: | Keywords: | ||
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
| Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
In some case, the test is dependant from view_func parameters.
For example : check user.pk and the user_id parameter to allow users to edit only themselves (and not be able to edit other just by changing the user_id)
Attachments (1)
Change History (2)
by , 15 years ago
| Attachment: | user_passes_test_decorator.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 15 years ago
| Resolution: | → wontfix |
|---|---|
| Status: | new → closed |
Hi, thanks for the suggestion. My feedback:
1) Your patch does not seem to be against trunk.
2) This would break compatibility with all code that provided a test_func which did not accept *args and **kwargs, which is the normal way to write the test_func.
3) The test could also be dependent on other things from the request, as well as *args and **kwargs. But the name of the decorator is 'user_passes_test' i.e. it checks something about the user. As such, the decorator does its job well.
So, if you want a decorator that does this, you can easily write your own, and that doesn't have any compatibility issues.
For these reasons, number 2 especially, I'm closing as WONTFIX.
patch for that if accepted