#1020 closed defect (fixed)
[patch]mutually referential models
| Reported by: | rjwittams | Owned by: | Adrian Holovaty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Component: | contrib.admin | Version: | |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
| Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
| Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
| Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Subsumes #746.
Allows mutually referential models. The string name is used as an argument to the ForeignKey.
Most field special casing in meta/init.py is moved to individual fields.
I think it should go in the "messing with models" branch.
Attachments (1)
Change History (7)
by , 19 years ago
| Attachment: | mutually-referential.diff added |
|---|
comment:1 by , 19 years ago
comment:3 by , 19 years ago
| Summary: | mutually referential models → [patch]mutually referential models |
|---|
comment:4 by , 19 years ago
| Status: | new → assigned |
|---|
Thanks for this, rjwittams. My plan is to explore the patch and eventually apply it to trunk. But the removing-magic stuff will definitely get its own branch.
comment:5 by , 19 years ago
comment:6 by , 19 years ago
| Resolution: | → fixed |
|---|---|
| Status: | assigned → closed |
This is working in magic-removal.
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.
this patch looks pretty self contained, and is backward compatible isn't it?
I mean..joe coder will not have to change 1 thing in his code if this patch went into the main branch.
the messing with models branch is about a much larger, incompatible change.
I vote stick it in the main branch, and fix the bugs IF they come.
I've been using #746 for months now with no problems.