Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #35969, comment 6


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 4, 2024, 11:15:24 AM (9 hours ago)
Author:
Simon Charette

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #35969, comment 6

    initial v1  
    66}}}
    77
    8 Which makes sense as `USING` is redundant with `TYPE` and could result in mismatches.
     8Which makes sense as `USING` is redundant with `TYPE` and could result in further ambiguity more if you change the generated expression at the same time.
    99
    1010Well the solution appears to simply not specifying `USING` when dealing with `GeneratedField` alterations as suggested in comment:2
Back to Top