Opened 10 months ago
Last modified 10 months ago
#35224 closed Cleanup/optimization
Make GenericForeignKey a subclass of Field — at Version 2
Reported by: | Adam Johnson | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | contrib.contenttypes | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
When introduced in bca5327b21eb2e3ee18292cbe532d6d0071201d8, GenericForeignKey was created as its own class. Since then, it has grown to resemble a field, particularly in fb48eb05816b1ac87d58696cdfe48be18c901f16.
GenericForeignKey *not* being a Field
leads to several issues:
- It is added as a “field” and returned by
Model._meta.get_fields()
, a type confusion reflected in django-stubs. - It duplicates code, such as
_check_field_name()
. - It misses methods like
__repr__()
.
I think we should make it a subclass of Field
.
(GenericRelation
has always been a subclass of Field
.)
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 10 months ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:2 by , 10 months ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Summary: | Make GenericForeignKey subclass Field → Make GenericForeignKey a subclass of Field |
Note:
See TracTickets
for help on using tickets.