#22257 closed New feature (fixed)
Write to specified file for dumpdata
Reported by: | Gwildor Sok | Owned by: | ANUBHAV JOSHI |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Management commands) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | anubhav9042@… | Triage Stage: | Accepted |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | yes |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
In response of ticket #22251, I'm opening this as a separate issue like requested. You can read the need for this option there, but basically it removes the current need and practice of redirecting the output of the command to a file, which is often done like this:
$ ./manage.py app1 app2 .. --format=json > dump.json
Removing the need to always do this would open up the possibility to add verbosity during the serialization (see #22251 and a new separate ticket for that).
Concrete proposal:
Add an option to specify a file name to write the output to (under the current working directory), and generate one automatically when one is not specific (e.g. "dump_20140312_1337".json/.xml").
Change History (19)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Cc: | added |
---|---|
Owner: | changed from | to
Status: | new → assigned |
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
I have already created patch for this. But one thing I want to ask is that whether we should keep default as stdout
or as proposed in the ticket some dumpdata.json
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
I have yet to add tests.
https://github.com/coder9042/django/compare/ticket_22258?expand=1
Currently the option has been added but default is stdout
.
I think that default should be as it is because there are times when data is not that big and people will like to see the result then and there itself, plus this way backward compatibility can be maintained.
follow-up: 7 comment:6 by , 11 years ago
Add an option to specify a file name to write the output to (under the current working directory)
Why under the current working directory? open()
does the right thing by default, if given a relative path, it'll use the current working directory. The current working directory could very much be readonly, and requiring people to cd
to target a specific directory is not practical.
From a quick look at the patch, I think it does the right thing.
follow-up: 10 comment:7 by , 11 years ago
Replying to loic84:
Add an option to specify a file name to write the output to (under the current working directory)
Why under the current working directory?
open()
does the right thing by default, if given a relative path, it'll use the current working directory. The current working directory could very much be readonly, and requiring people tocd
to target a specific directory is not practical.
From a quick look at the patch, I think it does the right thing.
I'm sorry, this was what I meant. So you can also do -o ../dumps/dump.json
, or something alike. Patch indeed looks good on that matter.
About the default: I agree that defaulting to stdout
is the way to go to maintain backwards compatibility. The main reason I opted for generating a filename and using that when not specific, is in the light of ticket #22258.
follow-up: 9 comment:8 by , 11 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|
follow-up: 11 comment:10 by , 11 years ago
Replying to Gwildor:
About the default: I agree that defaulting to
stdout
is the way to go to maintain backwards compatibility. The main reason I opted for generating a filename and using that when not specific, is in the light of ticket #22258.
Do you have any ideas in mind. If yes then please comment them out on #22258 itself. I want to know exactly what you are suggesting.
comment:11 by , 11 years ago
I think we can keep default as stdout
and and for #22258, we can do the following:
- When -o is not used, let the data be printed to
stdout
, as the data is printing people can see it and I don't think any progress display is required there. Also people may not want to open a file everytime they performdumpdata
even for small databases. If its large they'll use -o.
- When -o will be used, then we can display progress percentage or something like that.
backwards compatibilty is there, also issue in #22258 is also addressed.
thoughts?
comment:12 by , 11 years ago
If you're outputting to console, I don't see how you can display a progress indicator. Making a progress indicator dependent on the use of -o seems like a reasonable approach to me.
comment:13 by , 11 years ago
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
---|
comment:14 by , 11 years ago
Patch needs improvement: | set |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin → Accepted |
comment:15 by , 11 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → closed |
Yes, that makes sense.