Incorrect reference of defaults widgets in "Styling widget instances" docs

[Antoliny]

Hello!
I found an incorrect sentence in the ​Django widgets document customizing widget instances section.

For example, take the following form::

    from django import forms


    class CommentForm(forms.Form):
        name = forms.CharField()
        url = forms.URLField()
        comment = forms.CharField()

This form will include three default :class:`TextInput` widgets, with default
rendering -- no CSS class, no extra attributes. This means that the input boxes
provided for each widget will be rendered exactly the same:

The fields used in the above example CommentForm are CharField and URLField.
And the document has the following explanation.
"This form will include three default TextInput widgets"
​CharField default widget is TextInput, but ​URLField default widget is URLInput.
That's why I think this sentence is wrong and should be corrected.

[Antoliny]

I'm thinking about how to revise this sentence. How about this sentence?
"This form will include TextInput, URLInput widgets, with default rendering - no CSS class, no extra attributes. This means that the input boxes provided for each widget will be rendered almost the same:"

[Antoliny]

Both classes inherit Input,So I think it would be okey to change TextInput to Input.

[Sarah Boyce]

Thank you for spotting!
It looks like this was true when this was first written

I would suggest something like...

docs/ref/forms/widgets.txt

@@ -142 +142 @@
         url = forms.URLField()
         comment = forms.CharField()
 
-This form will include three default :class:`TextInput` widgets, with default
-rendering -- no CSS class, no extra attributes. This means that the input boxes
-provided for each widget will be rendered exactly the same:
+This form will include :class:`TextInput` widgets for the name and comment
+fields, and a :class:`URLInput` widget for the url field. Each with default
+rendering - no CSS class, no extra attributes:
 
 .. code-block:: pycon
 
@@ -154 +154 @@
     <div>Url:<input type="url" name="url" required></div>
     <div>Comment:<input type="text" name="comment" required></div>
 
-On a real web page, you probably don't want every widget to look the same. You
-might want a larger input element for the comment, and you might want the
-'name' widget to have some special CSS class. It is also possible to specify
-the 'type' attribute to take advantage of the new HTML5 input types.  To do
-this, you use the :attr:`Widget.attrs` argument when creating the widget::
+On a real web page, you probably want to customize this. You might want a
+larger input element for the comment, and you might want the 'name' widget to
+have some special CSS class. It is also possible to specify the 'type'
+attribute to use HTML5 input types. To do this, you use the
+:attr:`Widget.attrs` argument when creating the widget::
 
     class CommentForm(forms.Form):

[Antoliny]

Thank you for your good suggestion !! Sarah Boyce :0

[Antoliny]

​PR

[Sarah Boyce <42296566+sarahboyce@…>]

In 18b3a9dd:

Fixed #35889 -- Corrected reference of default widgets in "Styling widget instance" docs.

[Sarah Boyce <42296566+sarahboyce@…>]

In fe12428c:

[5.1.x] Fixed #35889 -- Corrected reference of default widgets in "Styling widget instance" docs.

Backport of 18b3a9dd395278232354a4f2507660a4f849c6eb from main.