Opened 3 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#33590 closed Bug
Related object is not resolved — at Version 1
Reported by: | Stefan de Konink | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Uncategorized | Version: | 4.0 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Unreviewed | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
I have the following setup; two managed models, and an unmanaged model which is a facade for a view in PostgreSQL. I can reduce the issue to only the unmanaged table with ordinary integer fields.
class NextSchedule(models.Model): scheduled = models.DateTimeField(blank=False, null=False, verbose_name=_('at')) exact_schedule_id = models.IntegerField(null=False) negative_schedule_id = models.IntegerField(null=True) class Meta: managed = False
My practical issue is that I am unable to get negative_schedule_id to be shown up. It is worse: when I explicitly query only a column with this value the queryset is empty.
blxa=> SELECT "blxadmin_nextschedule"."id", "blxadmin_nextschedule"."scheduled", "blxadmin_nextschedule"."exact_schedule_id", "blxadmin_nextschedule"."negative_schedule_id" FROM "blxadmin_nextschedule"; id | scheduled | exact_schedule_id | negative_schedule_id ----+---------------------+-------------------+---------------------- 7 | 2022-03-21 01:00:00 | 1 | 1 (1 row)
>>> NextSchedule.objects.all() <QuerySet []>
The crazy thing is, if the to_time of the negative schedule is increased over one hour, it will give a result. Mind you: we are still talking about an unrelated IntegerField, where as the query from PostgreSQL returns the same values.
>>> NextSchedule.objects.all() <QuerySet [<NextSchedule: NextSchedule object (7)>]>
So what about the view? The most simple view I can break it with is below, absolutely no fancy stuff other than a left join.
blxa=> create view blxadmin_nextschedule as select row_number() over (order by scheduled) as id, scheduled, exact_schedule_id, v.id as negative_schedule_id from (select '2022-03-21'::date + '01:00:00'::time as scheduled, 1 as exact_schedule_id) as u left join blxadmin_negativeschedule as v on (u.scheduled between v.from_datetime and v.to_datetime) order by scheduled asc; CREATE VIEW blxa=> SELECT "blxadmin_nextschedule"."id", "blxadmin_nextschedule"."scheduled", "blxadmin_nextschedule"."exact_schedule_id", "blxadmin_nextschedule"."negative_schedule_id" FROM "blxadmin_nextschedule"; id | scheduled | exact_schedule_id | negative_schedule_id ----+---------------------+-------------------+---------------------- 1 | 2022-03-21 01:00:00 | 1 | 1 (1 row)
Empty result.
NextSchedule.objects.get(id=1).negative_schedule_id
The model to reproduce it with simplified;
class NegativeSchedule(models.Model): from_datetime = models.DateTimeField(blank=False, null=False) to_datetime = models.DateTimeField(blank=False, null=False)
Date range that it does not work with:
21-03-2022 01:00:00 - 21-03-2022 01:59:59
Date range that it shows up with a value:
21-03-2022 01:00:00 - 21-03-2022 02:00:00
When the view is changed to have a coalesce, the coalesce value appears in the ORM.
blxa=> create view blxadmin_nextschedule as select row_number() over (order by scheduled) as id, scheduled, exact_schedule_id, coalesce(v.id, 0) as negative_schedule_id from (select '2022-03-21'::date + '01:00:00'::time as scheduled, 1 as exact_schedule_id) as u left join blxadmin_negativeschedule as v on (u.scheduled between v.from_datetime and v.to_datetime) order by scheduled asc; CREATE VIEW blxa=> select * from blxadmin_nextschedule ; id | scheduled | exact_schedule_id | negative_schedule_id ----+---------------------+-------------------+---------------------- 1 | 2022-03-21 01:00:00 | 1 | 1 (1 row)
>>> NextSchedule.objects.all()[0].scheduled, NextSchedule.objects.all()[0].exact_schedule_id, NextSchedule.objects.get(id=1).negative_schedule_id (datetime.datetime(2022, 3, 21, 1, 0), 1, 0)