Some cache tests are flaky (e.g. cache.tests.BaseMemcachedTests.test_touch)

[Chris Jerdonek]

The following tests occasionally fail in CI:

• cache.tests.PyLibMCCacheTests.test_touch
• cache.tests.PyMemcacheCacheTests.test_touch

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/pull-requests-bionic/database/sqlite3/label/bionic-pr/python/python3.8/tests/cache/tests.py", line 481, in test_touch
    self.assertIs(cache.touch('expire1'), True)
AssertionError: False is not True

The line that fails is here: ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/ed3af3ff4b3cfb72de598f1b39a1028ba3826efb/tests/cache/tests.py#L481

Both test classes inherit from BaseMemcachedTests, which inherits from BaseCacheTests.

[Mariusz Felisiak]

Yes these tests are flaky (and probably 2-3 more cache tests). We tried to fix them in the past but with no success (see ​PR).

[Chris Jerdonek]

Could this be due to different concrete subclasses of BaseMemcachedTests stepping on each other during a parallel run? I ask because different test classes are still using the same cache key.

[Chris Jerdonek]

Another cache-related flaky test is: cache.tests.CacheMiddlewareTest.test_cache_page_timeout on ​this line.

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Jenkins\workspace\pull-requests-windows\database\sqlite3\label\windows\python\Python39\tests\cache\tests.py", line 2449, in test_cache_page_timeout
    self.assertEqual(
AssertionError: b'Hello World 1' != b'Hello World 2'

[Chris Jerdonek]

A possible pattern for fixing issues like this would be to keep retrying the assertion in a while loop, with a small sleep in between each attempt, and a relatively large cumulative amount of time before giving up. That would make it as pass as quickly as possible, without waiting longer than necessary. I'm thinking of something like--

    def assert_with_retries(self, assert_func, *args,  interval_time=0.1, total_time=10, **kwargs):
        start = time.time()
        while True:
            try:
                assert_func(*args, **kwargs)
            except Exception as exc:
                if time.time() - start > total_time:
                    raise RuntimeError(f'Total retry time exceeded.') from exc
            else:
                break
            time.sleep(interval_time)

[Chris Jerdonek]

Something else that occurred to me is that it could only help to start each test by asserting that each key being used isn't set, and to end each test by clearing the key in a finally block. The former would help to show if a test isolation issue is at fault.

[Chris Jerdonek]

Another flaky test failure: cache.tests.MemcachedCacheTests.test_forever_timeout() at this line-- ​https://github.com/django/django/blob/1697098795707bd39501d9ceddd3d9be93f8d549/tests/cache/tests.py#L606
(again with pull-requests-bionic/database=spatialite,label=bionic-pr,python=python3.8).

[Natalia Bidart]

I started some debugging efforts ​in this forum post and landed a fix for test_touch when using ​the filebased cache backend.

[Natalia Bidart]

Cache flaky test in main-random:

 > git init /home/jenkins/workspace/main-random/database/spatialite/label/focal/python/python3.12 # timeout=10
...
Using shuffle seed: 5744808359 (generated)
...
======================================================================
FAIL [0.004s]: test_lru_get (cache.tests.LocMemCacheTests.test_lru_get)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/main-random/database/spatialite/label/focal/python/python3.12/django/test/utils.py", line 446, in inner
    return func(*args, **kwargs)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/main-random/database/spatialite/label/focal/python/python3.12/tests/cache/tests.py", line 1406, in test_lru_get
    self.assertEqual(cache.get(key), key)
AssertionError: None != 0

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 17769 tests in 1613.662s

FAILED (failures=1, skipped=1160, expected failures=5)

[Natalia Bidart]

Another one, different but similar:

...
Using shuffle seed: 5526860306 (generated)
...
======================================================================
ERROR [0.003s]: test_lru_incr (cache.tests.LocMemCacheTests.test_lru_incr)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/main-random/database/spatialite/label/focal/python/python3.12/django/test/utils.py", line 446, in inner
    return func(*args, **kwargs)
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/main-random/database/spatialite/label/focal/python/python3.12/tests/cache/tests.py", line 1433, in test_lru_incr
    self.assertEqual(cache.incr(key), key + 1)
                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/home/jenkins/workspace/main-random/database/spatialite/label/focal/python/python3.12/django/core/cache/backends/locmem.py", line 70, in incr
    raise ValueError("Key '%s' not found" % key)
ValueError: Key ':1:0' not found

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 17776 tests in 1566.550s

FAILED (errors=1, skipped=1161, expected failures=5)

[Simon Charette]

I get a sense that a lot of these failures are due to tests using their same global store at the same time as Chris pointed out. A clear sign of that is cache.clear is being called at setUp time.

A solution here could be to run these tests cases in they own separate key space (e.g. with a cache key prefix or with two distinct memcached instances) or to serialize them to ensure that no tests share the same resource (e.g. using a multiprocessing.lock acquired in setUp and released in tearDown).

There might be more too it though as I'm unsure what the djangci setup looks like. Is there one memcached / Redis instance per job or are they shared amongst them?

[Wassef Ben Ahmed]

to my understanding,

so far we don't know which tests exactly are flaky.
mainly the cases mentioned above, and anything that uses a shared medium.

as @Simon Charette suggested this could be done by figuring out where to set locks, which he also pointed out that it might get tricky depending on how djangoci works (I have no clue)
we might need to handle lock depending on the platform running the test or use something like "portalocker" which covers cross-platform locks but forces the adoption of a new dependency?

expanding on a previous answer by @Chris Jerdonek on setting assertion retries, why not set it at a unit level instead of individual assertion?

how you'd typically do with some pytest extensions... And we'll be assured the whole test passed without having to reason line-by-line on what went wrong?

implementation goes something like:

from functools import wraps
def retry(retries=3, delay=1):
    def decorator(func):
        @wraps(func)
        def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
            attempts = 0
            while attempts < retries:
                try:
                    return func(*args, **kwargs)
                except AssertionError as e:
                    attempts += 1
                    if attempts >= retries:
                        raise
                    time.sleep(delay)
        return wrapper
    return decorator

only catching/retrying on "AssertionError" so other exceptions are not permitted.

which I'm still not sure about? (maybe a shared medium causes you to pluck a None or something...)

[GitHub <noreply@…>]

In 957c54d9:

Fixed #32831 -– Allowed cache tests to be retried via a new "retry" decorator.

[Natalia <124304+nessita@…>]

In 33cd593:

[5.1.x] Fixed #32831 -– Allowed cache tests to be retried via a new "retry" decorator.

Backport of 957c54d945fedb58febff05e4ce82377cc43f9f4 from main.