5 | | So in the example above, where both annotated and aggregated kwargs are named `foo`, the output should actually contain just the last one, right? The first annotated `foo` column can just be renamed and then removed from the final result (to avoid confusion). That would be accesptable solution without large rewriting of the code I hope. |
| 5 | So in the example above, where both annotated and aggregated kwargs are named `foo`, the output should actually contain just the last one, right? The first annotated `foo` column can just be renamed and then removed from the final result (to avoid confusion). |
| 6 | |
| 7 | [Edit] Note that current resulting query might not contain some significant changes within firstly called annotate method as query.annotations dictionary's value is just overridden with the new value for key `foo` |