Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #30047, comment 9


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Dec 22, 2018, 9:45:10 PM (6 years ago)
Author:
powderflask

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #30047, comment 9

    initial v1  
    22> powderflask I assume you forgot to mention your query was using annotated aggregation functions?
    33
    4 Sorry.  Clearly didn't isolate this issue far enough before reporting. Yes, my query includes annotated aggregations.
     4Sorry.  Clearly didn't isolate this issue far enough before reporting. Yes, that query may have had annotated aggregations.
     5This was an issue I noticed while doing some probing on a large legacy code base.  Can't reproduce it myself now *&#&@
     6Clearly I jumped to a hasty conclusion about the behaviour I was seeing - feeling the idiot for not isolating this in a simple test case -- sorry for causing extra work.
Back to Top