Opened 8 years ago

Closed 8 years ago

Last modified 7 years ago

#27267 closed Bug (needsinfo)

Renaming a primary key fails with "cannot drop constraint on table because other objects depend on it"

Reported by: Melvyn Sopacua Owned by: nobody
Component: Migrations Version: 1.8
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Triage Stage: Unreviewed
Has patch: no Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description

When Django creates a foreign key constraint it uses a randomly generated string as part of the contraint name at the time it creates it. This has a side-effect that the names of these constraints are different for each database created. The better fix may then also be to get rid of this random string.

When one changes the type of a field that has foreign key references to it, then one cannot migrate the app. Attempts to use RunSQL fail, because as said, each database will have a different contraint name. This is most evident by just trying to create the test database with the following bit in a migration:

    operations = [
        migrations.RunSQL(
            [
                'ALTER TABLE dpe_dpecharacter DROP CONSTRAINT {}'.format(
                    FKEY_NAME
                ),
           ],
    ]

So if the path is chosen not to get rid of the random string, we need a way to find out what the actual name of the foreign key constraint is, preferably wrapped as migrations.DropForeignKey().

The real world case that triggered this, was that initial design used a CharField as primary key, yet limitations in either or both contrib.contenttypes or Mezzanine prevented this from working correctly and an autogenerated primary key had to be used instead. Dropping the primary key is no issue, since it's name is predictable and consistent amonst different incarnations of the database.

Change History (15)

comment:1 by Simon Charette, 8 years ago

Dropping a foreign key from from a field should be done automatically if you convert the field to it's underlying datatype.

For example, if you have a foreign key pointing to a CharField named foo replacing the ForeignKey by a CharField should be detected as an AlterField operation when running makemigrations. The AlterField operation should take care of dropping the constraint on migrate.

For example given these initial models.

class Foo(models.Model):
    id = models.CharField(max_length=20, primary_key=True)

class Bar(models.Model):
    foo = models.ForeignKey(Foo)

Changing your definitions to

class Foo(models.Model):
    pass  # Will use an implicit AutoField

class Bar(models.Model):
    foo = models.CharField(max_length=20)

Running makemigrations should generate a migration file with an operation similar to

AlterField('Bar', 'foo', models.CharField(max_length=20))

And running the migration containing this operation should drop the foreign key constraint.

Last edited 8 years ago by Simon Charette (previous) (diff)

comment:2 by Melvyn Sopacua, 8 years ago

I'll look into it more closely and reduce to bare minimum. If I remove the above drop statement, the migration doesn't work.

comment:3 by Melvyn Sopacua, 8 years ago

Version: 1.101.8

Updated version. This may be a 1.8 issue.

Just ran into the same beast, different trigger. I renamed a primary key and runs into the foreign key constraint:

        migrations.RenameField(
            model_name='itemtype',
            old_name='item_id',
            new_name='item_type_id',
        ),

Output:

django.db.utils.InternalError: cannot drop constraint dpe_itemtype_pkey on table dpe_itemtype because other objects depend on it
DETAIL:  constraint dpe_it_itemtype_ptr_id_3b50b94341daa361_fk_dpe_itemtype_item_id on table dpe_itemtypepage depends on index dpe_itemtype_pkey
constraint dpe_itemb_item_type_id_5c80224be6efb2ca_fk_dpe_itemtype_item_id on table dpe_itembase depends on index dpe_itemtype_pkey
HINT:  Use DROP ... CASCADE to drop the dependent objects too.

comment:4 by Tim Graham, 8 years ago

Type: UncategorizedBug

Could it be a duplicate of #22761? The same error message appears there. If not, can you provide a minimal set of models to reproduce?

comment:5 by Melvyn Sopacua, 8 years ago

I'm not using the to_field argument explicitedly (but my to_field is not named 'id') and that bug report is setup to be limited to a few cases. So far my experience is that any change to a model field that affects a foreign key pointing to it will blow up. This includes renaming the field, changing it's type or making a different field the primary key.

The minimal case is this:

class ItemType(models.Model):
    item_id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
    name = models.CharField(max_length=63)

class Item(models.Model):
    item_type = models.ForeignKey(ItemType)
    name = models.CharField(max_length=63)

Now change ItemType.item_id to ItemType.item_type_id. If this doesn't blow up for you, let me know and I'll make a proper test case.

comment:6 by Tim Graham, 8 years ago

I see the same RenameField operation from comment:3 but don't get a crash when running it. Tested with PostgreSQL 9.3.

comment:7 by Melvyn Sopacua, 8 years ago

I tried for a few hours to reduce it to a test case and failing. There's something at play that I'm not considering (all relations have been setup identical to the models in the project). So it's a corner-case, but I can't pick what in my design is causing it. Taking a break and a fresh look in a few days.

comment:8 by Tim Graham, 8 years ago

Resolution: needsinfo
Status: newclosed
Summary: Migrations: Need API to drop a foreign key constraintRenaming a primary key fails with "cannot drop constraint on table because other objects depend on it"

Thanks, please reopen if you are able to reproduce.

comment:9 by Melvyn Sopacua, 8 years ago

Resolution: needsinfo
Status: closednew

I'm not able to reproduce but closer to the cause.

I cannot save an instance of the model referenced 'dpecharacter' - this is the initial model that had a varchar primary key that I dropped. When I try to save a model I run into an integrity error for the id field (the autogenerated id). I checked and the sequence has correctly been created (postgres) as dpe_dpecharacter_id_seq in the public schema, but apparently isn't consulted.

When I try to regenrate the autofield, using a named auto field, makemigrations provides me with the "null field but no default" prompt. When I give a one-off default, migrate gives me:

django.db.utils.ProgrammingError: multiple default values specified for column "character_id" of table "dpe_dpecharacter"

The field declaration is: character_id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True). The migration code is:

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# Generated by Django 1.10.1 on 2016-10-07 12:53
from __future__ import unicode_literals

from django.db import migrations, models


class Migration(migrations.Migration):

    dependencies = [
        ('dpe', '0012_incubatorspot_destined_for'),
    ]

    operations = [
        migrations.RemoveField(
            model_name='dpecharacter',
            name='id',
        ),
        migrations.AddField(
            model_name='dpecharacter',
            name='character_id',
            field=models.AutoField(default=0, primary_key=True, serialize=False),
            preserve_default=False,
        ),
    ]

When I remove the default=0 argument from the field declaration, the migration goes through.

The old sequence has been dropped and the new one created with the correct name. Yet, once again I run into the integrity error, this time for the new field name "character_id".

Two problems here:

  1. I don't know how I got into this situation.
  2. I don't seem to be able to get out of it.

What should I be looking for as to why the serial isn't being consulted?

comment:10 by Melvyn Sopacua, 8 years ago

One step closer: the default in the column definition doesn't contain the Nextval() function for the serial. So two weird points:

  1. Django prompts for missing default and given that the Nextval() for the serial isn't being picked up this seems logical
  2. When a default is specified, suddenly psychopg2 complains about two defaults, so between that check and the SQL backend a default value is inserted *but* doesn't end up in the table definition.

comment:11 by Melvyn Sopacua, 8 years ago

And here's the cause:

-- % djmanage sqlmigrate dpe 0013_regenerate_primary_key_for_dpe_character
BEGIN;
--
-- Remove field id from dpecharacter
--
ALTER TABLE "dpe_dpecharacter" DROP COLUMN "id" CASCADE;
--
-- Add field character_id to dpecharacter
--
ALTER TABLE "dpe_dpecharacter" ADD COLUMN "character_id" serial NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY;
ALTER TABLE "dpe_dpecharacter" ALTER COLUMN "character_id" DROP DEFAULT;
COMMIT;

That's of course the preserve_default=False in the migration.
So that begs the question: Why does Django prompt for a default value for an AutoField?

comment:12 by Melvyn Sopacua, 8 years ago

Setting preserve_default to True or omitting the keyword argument still results in the DROP DEFAULT statement being emitted. I executed the statements from sqlmigrate without the DROP DEFAULT part to get out of the catch-22. As you can see in the initial comment this was also a table that ran into the drop contraint error.

I'm still baffled what makes this model and the item model different so that we can get to the root cause.

For completeness here's the model definition:

class DpeCharacter(
    uni_factory(max_length=32, verbose_name=_('name of character'))
):
    character_id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
    char_class = models.ForeignKey(
        CharacterClass, related_name='class_characters',
    )
    account = models.ForeignKey(
        'DpeAccount', models.CASCADE,
        related_name='my_characters',
        null=True, blank=True,
    )
    level = models.PositiveSmallIntegerField(
        verbose_name=_('current level'),
        validators=(
            MinValueValidator(1, 'Minimum level is 1'),
            MaxValueValidator(105, 'Maximum level is 105'),
        )
    )
    avatar = models.ImageField(
        verbose_name=_('avatar picture'),
        help_text=_('Square JPEG or PNG format, min 32x32, max 128x128 pixels'),
        upload_to=avatar_upload_to,
        height_field='avatar_height',
        width_field='avatar_width',
        null=True, blank=True,
    )
    avatar_height = models.PositiveSmallIntegerField(
        validators=(
            MinValueValidator(32, 'Avatar image too small.'),
            MaxValueValidator(128, 'Avatar image too tall.'),
        ),
        null=True, blank=True,
    )
    avatar_width = models.PositiveSmallIntegerField(
        validators=(
            MinValueValidator(32, 'Avatar image too narrow'),
            MaxValueValidator(128, 'Avatar image too wide'),
        ),
        null=True, blank=True,
    )

    def __str__(self):
        return '{} ({}-{})'.format(
            self.name, self.char_class.abbreviation, self.level
        )

    def clean(self):
        if self.avatar is not None:
            if self.avatar_height != self.avatar_width:
                raise ValidationError({'avatar': 'Image should be square'})

    class Meta:
        verbose_name = _('character')
        verbose_name_plural = _('characters')
        app_label = 'dpe'

And uni_factory:

class UniquelyNamedItemManager(models.Manager):
    def get_by_natural_key(self, name):
        return self.get(name=name)


class PagedUniquelyNamedItemManager(PageManager, UniquelyNamedItemManager):
    pass


def uni_factory(**kwargs):
    defaults = {
        'verbose_name': _('name'),
        'help_text': _('must be unique'),
        'is_paged': False,
    }
    defaults.update(kwargs)
    if defaults.pop('is_paged', False):
        manager = PagedUniquelyNamedItemManager
    else:
        manager = UniquelyNamedItemManager

    class UniquelyNamedItemMixin(models.Model):
        objects = manager()
        name = UniqueNameField(**defaults)
    
        def __str__(self):
            return self.name

        def natural_key(self):
            return self.name
    
        class Meta(models.base.ModelBase):
            app_label = 'dpe'
            abstract = True

    return UniquelyNamedItemMixin

And finally, UniqueNameFIeld:
{{{#!
class UniqueNameField(CharField):

title_transform = True
max_length = 63

def init(self, title_transform=True, *args, kwargs):

kwargsunique = True
kwargsmax_length = kwargs.get('max_length', self.max_length)
self.title_transform = title_transform
super(UniqueNameField, self).init(*args, kwargs)

def deconstruct(self):

name, path, args, kwargs = super(CharField, self).deconstruct()
kwargstitle_transform = self.title_transform
return name, path, args, kwargs

def pre_save(self, model_instance, add):

name = super(UniqueNameField, self).pre_save(model_instance, add)
if self.title_transform:

name = name.title()
setattr(model_instance, self.name, name)

return name

}}}

Version 0, edited 8 years ago by Melvyn Sopacua (next)

comment:13 by Tim Graham, 8 years ago

I'm not sure how changing a CharField primary key to an AutoField primary key should work (is it possible to autopopulate the column using the sequence?), but the current behavior of prompting for a default then erring with "multiple default values specified for column "character_id" of table "t27267_foo"" isn't good. I guess we could open a separate ticket for this issue. I'm not sure what else could be done with the information you provided.

comment:14 by Tim Graham, 8 years ago

Resolution: needsinfo
Status: newclosed

I created #27338 and #27339 based on issues I could find. I still don't see steps on how to reproduce the "cannot drop constraint" error.

comment:15 by Stephan Doliov, 7 years ago

For what it is worth, I encountered the same error.
I am using Django 2.01 and Postgres 9.6

I have a workaround for the problem simply by declaring my migration to be non-atomic
atomic = False

Here is what it looks like in practice for me. For certain migrations, I initialize them with data; if I undo the migration, I also want to clear out that seed data, in the right order as all my OneToOneFields have models.PROTECT declared, like so

    guid = models.OneToOneField(Guid, on_delete=models.PROTECT, primary_key=True)

so then my migrations looks like

# Generated by Django 2.0.2 on 2018-03-07 23:52

from django.core import management
from django.db import migrations, models

import django.db.models.deletion

from dim.models import Guid, Role

def create_fixture(apps, schema_editor):
    management.call_command('dumpdata', 'dim.Role', format='json',
                            indent=4, output='dim/fixtures/000002_dim_role.json'
                           )

def init_data(apps, schema_editor):
    Role.objects.create(guid=Guid.objects.create(), name="Basic Consumer")
    Role.objects.create(guid=Guid.objects.create(), name="Basic Publisher")

def clear_data(apps, schema_editor):
    import pdb
    pdb.set_trace()
    for role in Role.objects.all():
        guid = role.guid.guid
        role.delete(purge=True)
        Guid.objects.get(guid=guid).delete(purge=True)
    migrations.RunSQL("drop table dim_role cascade")

class Migration(migrations.Migration):

    atomic = False
    
    dependencies = [
        ('dim', '0001_initial'),
    ]

    operations = [
        migrations.CreateModel(
            name='Role',
            fields=[
                ('guid', models.OneToOneField(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.PROTECT, primary_key=True, serialize=False, to='dim.Guid')),
                ('name', models.CharField(max_length=64, unique=True, verbose_name='name')),
                ('created_ts', models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)),
                ('updated_ts', models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True, null=True)),
                ('deleted_ts', models.DateTimeField(null=True)),
            ],
            options={
                'verbose_name': 'role',
                'verbose_name_plural': 'roles',
                'db_table': 'dim_role',
            },
        ),
        migrations.RunPython(init_data, reverse_code=clear_data),
        migrations.RunPython(create_fixture, reverse_code=migrations.RunPython.noop)
    ]
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top