Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of Ticket #27211


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Sep 13, 2016, 1:34:18 PM (8 years ago)
Author:
Tim Graham
Comment:

​PR

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #27211

    • Property Has patch set
    • Property Triage Stage Unreviewed → Accepted
    • Property Type New feature → Bug

  • Ticket #27211 – Description

    v4 v5  
    1 Most browsers can cache responses with 304 HTTP code. So why not to include such headers to response if necessary.
    2 
    3 '''UPDATE''':
    4 According to the [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232 RFC7232] all "304 Not Modified" responses must include "Cache-Control" and "Expires" headers that would have been sent in a corresponding "200 OK" response.
    5 
    6 See [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-4.1 Section 4.1 of RFC7232]
     1According to [https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-4.1 RFC7232] all "304 Not Modified" responses must include "Cache-Control" and "Expires" headers that would have been sent in a corresponding "200 OK" response.
Back to Top