Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of Ticket #26007, comment 3
- Timestamp:
- Dec 30, 2015, 12:18:10 PM (9 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #26007, comment 3
v1 v2 4 4 5 5 I think the patch implements the intended behaviour (or why bother trying to `insert(0, name)`, and compare the implementation in `MultipleObjectTemplateResponseMixin.get_template_names`), and cases were someone has set both template_name and template_field_name is rare or non-existant, but given this possibility, we may want to defer the change to 1.10 with or without accelerated deprecation. Advise? 6 7 One possibility is we can detect when both template_name and template_field_name are defined and raise a deprecation warning, and then fix the stack in a later version. If that's preferable, I'll make the change, and would we want it deprecated for 1.10 or 1.11 ?