Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 9 years ago
#24576 closed Bug
Bad cascading leads to non-deterministic IntegrityError — at Version 1
Reported by: | Marc Aymerich | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | 1.8 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | feierlaura10@… | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description (last modified by )
I've spent all day with a bug on my application that seems to be a bug on Django's ORM delete on cascade resolution order.
Moreover because the order in which related objects are deleted by the ORM is non-deterministic (changes every time you start the interpreter) it makes even harder to track down.
So far I've been able to reproduce the problem with a few models:
from django.db import models from django.contrib.contenttypes.fields import GenericForeignKey, GenericRelation from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType from django.db.models.signals import post_delete from django.dispatch import receiver class Resource(models.Model): content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType) object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField() content_object = GenericForeignKey() class Account(models.Model): name = models.CharField(max_length=10) resources = GenericRelation(Resource) class Order(models.Model): account = models.ForeignKey(Account) content_type = models.ForeignKey(ContentType) object_id = models.PositiveIntegerField() content_object = GenericForeignKey() class MetricStorage(models.Model): order = models.ForeignKey(Order) @receiver(post_delete, dispatch_uid="orders.cancel_orders") def cancel_orders(sender, **kwargs): instance = kwargs['instance'] print('delete', sender, instance, instance.pk) if sender == Resource: related = instance.content_object if related: ct = ContentType.objects.get_for_model(related) order = Order.objects.get(content_type=ct, object_id=related.pk) order.metricstorage_set.create() order.save() else: print('related is None')
And this test code
from test.models import Account, Resource, Order account = Account.objects.create(name='John') resource = Resource.objects.create(content_object=account) order = Order.objects.create(account=account, content_object=account) account.delete()
In order to properly test this you should make tries restarting the interpreter a handful of times, and then you'll see two different results.
This that I consider correct:
delete <class 'test.models.Order'> Order object 384 delete <class 'test.models.Account'> Account object 124 delete <class 'test.models.Resource'> Resource object 307 related is None
And the IntegrityError which I consider to be a bug
delete <class 'test.models.Resource'> Resource object 311 delete <class 'test.models.Order'> Order object 388 delete <class 'test.models.Account'> Account object 128 Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 1, in <module> File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/django/db/models/base.py", line 872, in delete collector.delete() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/django/db/models/deletion.py", line 314, in delete sender=model, instance=obj, using=self.using File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/django/db/transaction.py", line 232, in __exit__ connection.commit() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/django/db/backends/base/base.py", line 173, in commit self._commit() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/django/db/backends/base/base.py", line 142, in _commit return self.connection.commit() File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/django/db/utils.py", line 97, in __exit__ six.reraise(dj_exc_type, dj_exc_value, traceback) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/django/utils/six.py", line 658, in reraise raise value.with_traceback(tb) File "/usr/local/lib/python3.4/dist-packages/django/db/backends/base/base.py", line 142, in _commit return self.connection.commit() django.db.utils.IntegrityError: insert or update on table "test_metricstorage" violates foreign key constraint "test_metricstorage_order_id_730c757c66b8c627_fk_test_order_id" DETAIL: Key (order_id)=(388) is not present in table "test_order".
Notice how the order in which related objects are deleted is different, I believe this to be the source of the problem.
I've noticed this problem on 1.7 and now 1.8, not tested with master.
Change History (1)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
I could also reproduce on master with your example code.