Opened 10 years ago
Last modified 3 years ago
#24481 new New feature
Improve sqlmigrate to be more flexible and allow bypassing migrations on disk
Reported by: | pascal chambon | Owned by: | |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Management commands) | Version: | dev |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | migrate migrations sqlall |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
When upgrading a django+djangocms install to latest versions, things got broken (at least one sql table with missing, even though MIGRATION_MODULES was well filled and "manage.py migrate" indicated all was up-to-date).
I wanted to use sqlall and other commands to diff my existing DB with the "theoretical" one, but django refused, indicating that only sqlmigrate and sqlflush were allowed for apps with migrations. I had to redeploy another install from scratch to do the diff.
Wouldn't it be better to issue a warning in these cases, but let the developper use these tools to understand what's wrong, and manually "fake" migrations when stuffs are out of control ?
Change History (9)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
Do you mean "sqlmigrate" would output, in sequence, all "alter tables" commands to recreate the final DBs ?
I've had a look at django\core\management\sql.py, a function check_for_migrations() is called to abort when some models use migrations, but other than that, nothing seems to prevent generation from sql for migration-enabled models. There is even, farther, code which looks explicitely dedicated to migration handling ("for model in router.get_migratable_models(app_config, connection.alias, include_auto_created=True)").
From what I understand, these sql* commands browse current model objects, and convert them to sql statements, so I guess they shouldn't care about whether these python classes have some "history" behind them. Or am I misunderstanding how all that works ?
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|---|
Type: | Bug → New feature |
Version: | 1.7 → master |
It might work. Would be happy to look at a patch but might have to close this if it ends up being confusing or not feasible to implement.
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Looked at the master-branch code, all the code for these commands has disappeared from it, however it'd really be worth to resurrect the "sqlcreate" command only, it's invaluable for quick debugging of migration troubles.
I'll start a thread on the mailing-list to see what's the status about all this.
comment:5 by , 9 years ago
I've started working on this here: https://github.com/django/django/pull/4729
comment:6 by , 9 years ago
Summary: | Allow use of sql* commands even on apps with migrations → Improve sqlmigrate to be more flexible and allow bypassing migrations on disk |
---|
Andrew, Loic, Florian and I came up with the following list of features we want sqlmigrate
to support:
- just one migration
- list of migration names
- start / end of migration graph
- ignore migrations and build straight from models
comment:7 by , 9 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
comment:8 by , 9 years ago
Status: | new → assigned |
---|
comment:9 by , 3 years ago
Owner: | removed |
---|---|
Status: | assigned → new |
I think those commands can't work like they did before because when there are multiple migrations, I don't think it's feasible to determine what the resulting database schema will look like.
Maybe an idea would be to make the
migration_name
argument tosqlmigrate
optional so that you could dosqlmigrate <app_name>
to get the SQL for all of your migrations in an app. I guess we might be able to makeapp_name
optional as well so thatsqlmigrate
could easily output the SQL for all migrations of all apps.