Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #22875


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 19, 2014, 3:13:44 PM (10 years ago)
Author:
Ramiro Morales
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified

  • Ticket #22875 – Description

    initial v1  
    8686Initially Employee didn't exist and the m2m relationship was against a custom User model.
    8787
    88 After that trying to create a minimal setup that reproduces the issue, usage of the swappable user model feature was removed and the m2m field was re-pointed to standard auth.User, and finally to a local Employee model.
     88After that (and when trying to create a minimal setup that reproduces the issue):
     89
     90- First usage of the swappable user model feature was removed and the m2m field was re-pointed to standard auth.User
     91- And finally to a local Employee model.
     92
     93In all cases, the same exception was generated.
Back to Top