#22688 closed Bug (fixed)
Apps.set_installed_apps() re-executes AppConfig.ready() methods
Reported by: | Aymeric Augustin | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Core (Other) | Version: | 1.7-beta-2 |
Severity: | Release blocker | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Ready for checkin | |
Has patch: | yes | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | no | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
The current implementation of set_installed_apps() calls populate(), which is going to execute ready() methods of applications.
We should:
- either add a flag to the app registry to track whether ready() has been executed yet,
- or document that ready() must be idempotent.
Change History (6)
comment:1 by , 10 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
comment:2 by , 10 years ago
This is interesting but very tied to set_installed_apps. I was thinking of a flag on the AppConfig instance. It would be simple and easy to reset if needed.
Also I think there's a use case for reexecuting ready() whenever INSTALLED_APPS changes: apps that set up things based on INSTALLED_APPS.
comment:3 by , 10 years ago
Then the documentation approach:
diff --git a/docs/ref/applications.txt b/docs/ref/applications.txt index 829e273..f68ea38 100644 --- a/docs/ref/applications.txt +++ b/docs/ref/applications.txt @@ -238,6 +238,15 @@ Methods separate from the production settings, ``manage.py test`` would still execute some queries against your **production** database! + .. note:: + + In the usual initialization process, the ``ready`` method is only called + once by Django. But in some corner cases, particularly in tests which + are fiddling with installed applications, ``ready`` might be called more + than once. In that case, either write idempotents methods, or put a flag + on your ``AppConfig`` classes to prevent re-running code which should + be executed exactly one time. + .. _namespace package: Namespace packages as apps (Python 3.3+)
I purposefully mentioned AppConfig
classes, not instances, because I think that populate
is recreating new AppConfig
instances.
comment:4 by , 10 years ago
Has patch: | set |
---|---|
Triage Stage: | Accepted → Ready for checkin |
Excellent, can you commit that?
It keeps the code simple and at worst we can adjust the behavior if it proves to be a problem in practice.
comment:5 by , 10 years ago
Resolution: | → fixed |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
A possible fix: https://gist.github.com/claudep/82122f524b08385859ab