Opened 11 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
#21703 closed Bug (fixed)
`exclude` query with `F` object across relationship fails
Reported by: | anonymous | Owned by: | nobody |
---|---|---|---|
Component: | Database layer (models, ORM) | Version: | 1.6 |
Severity: | Normal | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Triage Stage: | Accepted | |
Has patch: | no | Needs documentation: | no |
Needs tests: | yes | Patch needs improvement: | no |
Easy pickings: | no | UI/UX: | no |
Description
Given the following models..
Code highlighting:
class Owner(models.Model): pass class Thing(models.Model): owner = models.ForeignKey(Owner, related_name='things') date = models.DateField() class Error(models.Model): owner = models.ForeignKey(Owner, related_name='errors') date = models.DateField()
The following exclude
query fails.
Code highlighting:
>>> Error.objects.exclude(owner__things__date=F('date')) Traceback (most recent call last): File "<console>", line 1, in <module> File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 115, in __repr__ data = list(self[:REPR_OUTPUT_SIZE + 1]) File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 140, in __iter__ self._fetch_all() File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 962, in _fetch_all self._result_cache = list(self.iterator()) File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 264, in iterator for row in compiler.results_iter(): File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 681, in results_iter for rows in self.execute_sql(MULTI): File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 762, in execute_sql cursor.execute(sql, params) File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 77, in execute return super(CursorDebugWrapper, self).execute(sql, params) File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 61, in execute return self.cursor.execute(sql, params) File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/utils.py", line 93, in __exit__ six.reraise(dj_exc_type, dj_exc_value, traceback) File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 61, in execute return self.cursor.execute(sql, params) File "/Users/foobar/python-environments/358426a27f281ff5/lib/python2.7/site-packages/django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py", line 489, in execute return Database.Cursor.execute(self, query, params) OperationalError: no such column: U1.id
The same query using a filter
works as expected. This bug is present in 1.5.5
, 1.6.1
and 1.7.dev20131229181725
Change History (11)
comment:1 by , 11 years ago
comment:2 by , 11 years ago
Component: | Uncategorized → Database layer (models, ORM) |
---|---|
Type: | Uncategorized → Bug |
comment:3 by , 11 years ago
This seems to be related to, if not the same as, Bug #18726 (see especially ticket:18726#comment:8).
comment:4 by , 11 years ago
Triage Stage: | Unreviewed → Accepted |
---|
I can reproduce this too.
I'm not sure if it's the same bug as #18726 (the error messages are different) but it might be related.
#21787 is another ticket where filter()
works but exclude()
breaks (this one is actually a regression which I traced back to b4492a8ca4a7ae4daa3a6b03c3d7a845fad74931).
comment:5 by , 11 years ago
This one is complex to solve. In the query F('date') must refer the outer query's date field, not anything in the inner query. The way split_exclude() is implemented is to add .filter(ownre__things__date=F('date'))
in the inner query, then trimming prefixes. We could add the F() into the outer query and pass that value to the inner query. Unfortunately that doesn't work if the F() object references something in the inner query (for example F('owner__things__somecol')
). In that case we must add the F() to the outer query. In addition, this gets even more complicated if you use F('date') + F('owner__things__somecol')
. Neither inner nor outer query addition works, the first F() needs to refer to outer, the second to inner query.
So, we need bigger changes into the ORM. I think we need to teach setup_joins() to auto-refer to the right query based on prefix, and rework how split_exclude() works. I don't have good ideas of how to actually achieve all this. It seems implementing this is going to need a lot of work.
There are other complex cases to be solved for .split_exclude() - for example .exclude(owner__things__date__gte=date1, owner__things__date__lte=date2)
doesn't work currently, and I suspect there are similar problems if you use complex boolean trees where some parts refer to outer query, some parts to inner. The most complex case is to have references to two different m2m joins, something like: .exclude(owner__things__date__gte=date1, creator__things__date__lte=date2)
. I am not even sure how to write that in SQL using subqueries...
It seems #18762 is at least close to this, if not duplicate. I haven't done enough research to be certain.
comment:6 by , 7 years ago
I closed #28551 as a duplicate (same problem query across a many-to-many relation).
comment:7 by , 6 years ago
The way
split_exclude()
is implemented is to addfilter(owner__things__date=F('date'))
in the inner query, ...
I wonder if this could be fixed by making split_exclude()
add filter(owner__things__date=OuterRef('date'))
in the inner query instead.
comment:8 by , 6 years ago
I confirmed this is fixed by relying on OuterRef
-
django/db/models/sql/query.py
diff --git a/django/db/models/sql/query.py b/django/db/models/sql/query.py index 7d991b6b84..458ecaa02a 100644
a b from django.core.exceptions import ( 19 19 from django.db import DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS, NotSupportedError, connections 20 20 from django.db.models.aggregates import Count 21 21 from django.db.models.constants import LOOKUP_SEP 22 from django.db.models.expressions import Col, F, Ref, SimpleCol 22 from django.db.models.expressions import ( 23 Col, F, OuterRef, Ref, SimpleCol, Subquery, 24 ) 23 25 from django.db.models.fields import Field 24 26 from django.db.models.fields.related_lookups import MultiColSource 25 27 from django.db.models.lookups import Lookup … … class Query: 1630 1632 saner null handling, and is easier for the backend's optimizer to 1631 1633 handle. 1632 1634 """ 1635 if isinstance(filter_expr[1], F): 1636 filter_expr = (filter_expr[0], OuterRef(filter_expr[1].name)) 1633 1637 # Generate the inner query. 1634 1638 query = Query(self.model) 1635 1639 query.add_filter(filter_expr) … … class Query: 1662 1666 query.where.add(lookup, AND) 1663 1667 query.external_aliases.add(alias) 1664 1668 1669 from django.db import models 1670 queryset = models.QuerySet(self.model, query) 1665 1671 condition, needed_inner = self.build_filter( 1666 ('%s__in' % trimmed_prefix, query),1672 ('%s__in' % trimmed_prefix, Subquery(queryset)), 1667 1673 current_negated=True, branch_negated=True, can_reuse=can_reuse) 1668 1674 if contains_louter: 1669 1675 or_null_condition, _ = self.build_filter(
But this makes Query
depend on QuerySet
which we want to avoid. I have always thought Subquery
wrapping of QuerySet
instances was unnecessary and that OuterRef
ought to be resolved by Query
anyway so I'll give it a try.
comment:9 by , 6 years ago
Needs tests: | set |
---|
Addressed by https://github.com/django/django/pull/11062
This bug is also confirmed present on the mysql backend.