Opened 12 years ago

Last modified 4 years ago

#20024 new Bug

'exclude' does not work with lists containing a 'None' element. — at Version 3

Reported by: stillwater.ke@… Owned by: nobody
Component: Database layer (models, ORM) Version: dev
Severity: Normal Keywords:
Cc: Carsten Fuchs, Simon Charette Triage Stage: Accepted
Has patch: no Needs documentation: no
Needs tests: no Patch needs improvement: no
Easy pickings: no UI/UX: no

Description (last modified by Luke Plant)

For example:

Entry.objects.exclude(foo__in=[None, 1])

It is supposed to return all items whose foo field is not None or 1, but it actually returns an empty query set.

Change History (3)

comment:1 by Anssi Kääriäinen, 12 years ago

Triage Stage: UnreviewedAccepted
Type: UncategorizedBug

This is a known failure (tested in queries/tests.py, test_col_not_in_list_containing_null()).

This is somewhat hard to fix as SQL's "somecol NOT IN lst_containing_null" is weird - it will always return False (well, technically UNKNOWN but this doesn't matter here), and this is what causes the bug.

It would be possible to check for presence of None in the given list. If present, remove it and add in a proper IS NULL check instead. But then a query like .exclude(somecol__in=qs_containig_null) would work differently from .exclude(somecol__in=list(qs_containig_null)). I guess that could be classified as known abstraction leak.

comment:2 by Aymeric Augustin, 12 years ago

Let's not be too smart... NULL in SQL is nowhere near as consistent as None in Python because of SQL's tri-valued boolean logic; we cannot hide this.

comment:3 by Luke Plant, 12 years ago

Description: modified (diff)
Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.
Back to Top